Effectiveness of the Reading, Answering, Discussing, Explaining, and Creating (RADEC) Learning Model in Improving High School Students' Critical Thinking Skills on Colloid Material

Students need to be able to think critically in order to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Be that as it may, the decisive reasoning abilities of understudies are still somewhat low. The RADEC model is a learning model that can aid in the development of critical thinking abilities. The goal of this study is to find out how well the RADEC model helps students in high school think critically about colloidal materials. This study employs experimental, quantitative research techniques. The populace is all understudies in class XI MIPA at SMAN 5 Samarinda. The examples were understudies from class XI MIPA 2 and XI MIPA 4 at SMAN 5 Samarinda, adding up to 75 individuals. The exploration test was chosen utilizing a group irregular inspecting strategy. One-group pre-test post-test design was utilized in the research design. Information assortment involves tests as pre-tests and post-tests, educator and understudy movement perception sheets, and understudy reaction surveys. Statistical tests were conducted first, including the N-Gain test and the effect size test, for data analysis. According to the findings of the research, the RADEC model meets the effective criteria in terms of students' responses to learning based on the RADEC learning model and their increased critical thinking abilities. The findings of the research lead us to the conclusion that the RADEC model works to improve students' critical thinking abilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37905/jjec.v6i2.25989
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of the Reading, Answering, Discussing, Explaining, and Creating (RADEC) Learning Model in Improving High School Students' Critical Thinking Skills on Colloid Material

Sukemi Sukemi, Usman Usman, Neni Hasnah Fatimah
Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Effectiveness of the Reading, Answering, Discussing, Explaining, and Creating (RADEC) Learning Model in Improving High School Students' Critical Thinking Skills on Colloid Material

Sukemi Sukemi, Usman Usman, Neni Hasnah Fatimah
article en

Abstract

Students need to be able to think critically in order to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Be that as it may, the decisive reasoning abilities of understudies are still somewhat low. The RADEC model is a learning model that can aid in the development of critical thinking abilities. The goal of this study is to find out how well the RADEC model helps students in high school think critically about colloidal materials. This study employs experimental, quantitative research techniques. The populace is all understudies in class XI MIPA at SMAN 5 Samarinda. The examples were understudies from class XI MIPA 2 and XI MIPA 4 at SMAN 5 Samarinda, adding up to 75 individuals. The exploration test was chosen utilizing a group irregular inspecting strategy. One-group pre-test post-test design was utilized in the research design. Information assortment involves tests as pre-tests and post-tests, educator and understudy movement perception sheets, and understudy reaction surveys. Statistical tests were conducted first, including the N-Gain test and the effect size test, for data analysis. According to the findings of the research, the RADEC model meets the effective criteria in terms of students' responses to learning based on the RADEC learning model and their increased critical thinking abilities. The findings of the research lead us to the conclusion that the RADEC model works to improve students' critical thinking abilities.

Jambura Journal of Educational ChemistryVol. 6(2)
Mulawarman University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.