Cooperation objective evaluation in aviation: validation and comparison of two novel approaches in simulated environment

The findings demonstrated the possibility of quantifying cooperation levels among pilots during realistic flight simulations. In addition, cooperation time is found to be significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) among Experienced pilots compared to Unexperienced ones. Furthermore, these preliminary results exhibited significant correlations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with subjective and behavioral measures collected every 30 s during the task, confirming their reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2024.1409322
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cooperation objective evaluation in aviation: validation and comparison of two novel approaches in simulated environment

Fabio Babiloni, Andrea Giorgi, Alessia Vozzi, Gianluca Di Flumeri et al.
7 citations
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.50
article

Cooperation objective evaluation in aviation: validation and comparison of two novel approaches in simulated environment

Fabio Babiloni, Andrea Giorgi, Alessia Vozzi, Gianluca Di Flumeri, Daniele Germano, Pietro Aricò, Nicolina Sciaraffa, Gianluca Borghini, Lorenzo Mezzadri, Rossella Capotorto, Vincenzo Ronca
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The findings demonstrated the possibility of quantifying cooperation levels among pilots during realistic flight simulations. In addition, cooperation time is found to be significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) among Experienced pilots compared to Unexperienced ones. Furthermore, these preliminary results exhibited significant correlations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with subjective and behavioral measures collected every 30 s during the task, confirming their reliability.

Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsVol. 18
Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.