Distal versus proximal radial access in coronary angiography: a meta-analysis
In this largest meta-analysis to date, we were able to show that rates of RAO are reduced with DRA compared to conventional PRA. This suggests DRA is a safe alternative to PRA.
Authors
- David M. Leistner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-420X)
- Julia Lueg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7905-704X)
- Daniel Schulze (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9415-2555)
- Robert Stöhr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1468-2554)
Institutions
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE)
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE)
- University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Research in Cardiology
- Published
- 2024-09-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02505-3
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Vascular Procedures and Complications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.51
Funders
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin