Investigating FIT kit completion for CRC screening in younger adults in rural areas

Rural regions have higher incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) than urban regions, while screening is lower in rural residents than in urban residents. Rural residents experience barriers to CRC screening due to a lack of access to healthcare, perceived lack of privacy, and other cultural factors. The fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) may provide an inexpensive and convenient alternative for those lacking access to a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. In a clinical trial, we investigated factors that influenced the return of a FIT kit for CRC screening among 1,230 rural residents in a midwestern U.S. state. Participants were selected from two cancer screening databases maintained by the state health department. Participants returning and not returning the FIT kit were compared for differences by age category (45–54, 55–64, 65–74), gender (female vs. male), race (non-white vs. white), and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. not Hispanic) using chi-square tests and logistic regression. Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to assess differences in FIT kit return time by age and gender. The youngest age group was significantly less likely to return the FIT kit and were slower at returning it when they did. In models adjusted for age category, females were significantly more likely to return the FIT kit than males and returned the FIT kit sooner than males. The results suggest that efforts are needed to reach those 45 to 55, especially males, who are not likely to see the need for CRC screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Social Science and Health
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44155-024-00102-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating FIT kit completion for CRC screening in younger adults in rural areas

Cheryl L. Beseler, Roma Subramanian, Emma Hymel, Karen Funkenbusch et al.
1 citations
Discover Social Science and Health
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
0.28
article

Investigating FIT kit completion for CRC screening in younger adults in rural areas

Cheryl L. Beseler, Roma Subramanian, Emma Hymel, Karen Funkenbusch, Susan J. Harris, Aaron Yoder, Jason M. Foster, Shinobu Watanabe‐Galloway, Tamara Robinson, Jungyoon Kim, Melissa Leypoldt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Rural regions have higher incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) than urban regions, while screening is lower in rural residents than in urban residents. Rural residents experience barriers to CRC screening due to a lack of access to healthcare, perceived lack of privacy, and other cultural factors. The fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) may provide an inexpensive and convenient alternative for those lacking access to a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. In a clinical trial, we investigated factors that influenced the return of a FIT kit for CRC screening among 1,230 rural residents in a midwestern U.S. state. Participants were selected from two cancer screening databases maintained by the state health department. Participants returning and not returning the FIT kit were compared for differences by age category (45–54, 55–64, 65–74), gender (female vs. male), race (non-white vs. white), and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. not Hispanic) using chi-square tests and logistic regression. Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to assess differences in FIT kit return time by age and gender. The youngest age group was significantly less likely to return the FIT kit and were slower at returning it when they did. In models adjusted for age category, females were significantly more likely to return the FIT kit than males and returned the FIT kit sooner than males. The results suggest that efforts are needed to reach those 45 to 55, especially males, who are not likely to see the need for CRC screening.

Discover Social Science and HealthVol. 4(1)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), Nebraska Medical Center (US), Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (US), Nebraska Cancer Specialists (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US), University of Missouri (US)
Central States Center for Agricultural Safety and Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.