COMPARISON OF DIRECT STENTING VERSUS PRE-DILATION OUTCOMES IN PRIMARY PCI AT A MAJOR HOSPITAL

Stents are utilized in over 95% of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), and advancements in balloon and stent technologies have fostered the development of direct stent (DS) delivery. This approach, which bypasses pre-dilatation, may offer distinct advantages over conventional stenting (CS), which includes balloon dilation before stenting. Objective: To evaluate the angiographic and short-term clinical outcomes of direct stent placement compared to traditional stenting following balloon dilation in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2023 to May 2024 at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Pakistan. One hundred patients undergoing primary PCI were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (n=50) received direct stent placement, and Group B (n=50) underwent stenting following balloon dilation. Data collection included demographic details, coronary intervention details, and procedural outcomes from medical records. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, with Independent samples t-tests used to compare fluoroscopy times, procedure durations, and contrast usage, considering a P-value < 0.05 as significant. Results: The study enrolled 100 patients, with a mean age of 52.8 ± 11.0 years; 76% were male. The most commonly treated vessel was the left anterior descending artery. Group A demonstrated a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (4.6 ± 2.9 minutes vs. 6.9 ± 4.1 minutes, P=0.001) and total procedure duration (24.4 ± 12.4 minutes vs. 34.6 ± 13.5 minutes, P=0.008) compared to Group B. Furthermore, Group A used less contrast material than Group B. Conclusion: Direct stenting offers a safer, quicker, and more cost-effective alternative to conventional stenting with balloon dilation in primary PCI. This method reduces radiation exposure, procedural costs, and operational time, potentially enhancing outcomes for patients and healthcare teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1114
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF DIRECT STENTING VERSUS PRE-DILATION OUTCOMES IN PRIMARY PCI AT A MAJOR HOSPITAL

Maryum Masoud, Farah Shireen
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

COMPARISON OF DIRECT STENTING VERSUS PRE-DILATION OUTCOMES IN PRIMARY PCI AT A MAJOR HOSPITAL

Maryum Masoud, Farah Shireen
article en

Abstract

Stents are utilized in over 95% of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), and advancements in balloon and stent technologies have fostered the development of direct stent (DS) delivery. This approach, which bypasses pre-dilatation, may offer distinct advantages over conventional stenting (CS), which includes balloon dilation before stenting. Objective: To evaluate the angiographic and short-term clinical outcomes of direct stent placement compared to traditional stenting following balloon dilation in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2023 to May 2024 at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Pakistan. One hundred patients undergoing primary PCI were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (n=50) received direct stent placement, and Group B (n=50) underwent stenting following balloon dilation. Data collection included demographic details, coronary intervention details, and procedural outcomes from medical records. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, with Independent samples t-tests used to compare fluoroscopy times, procedure durations, and contrast usage, considering a P-value < 0.05 as significant. Results: The study enrolled 100 patients, with a mean age of 52.8 ± 11.0 years; 76% were male. The most commonly treated vessel was the left anterior descending artery. Group A demonstrated a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (4.6 ± 2.9 minutes vs. 6.9 ± 4.1 minutes, P=0.001) and total procedure duration (24.4 ± 12.4 minutes vs. 34.6 ± 13.5 minutes, P=0.008) compared to Group B. Furthermore, Group A used less contrast material than Group B. Conclusion: Direct stenting offers a safer, quicker, and more cost-effective alternative to conventional stenting with balloon dilation in primary PCI. This method reduces radiation exposure, procedural costs, and operational time, potentially enhancing outcomes for patients and healthcare teams.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 2024(1)
Hayatabad Medical Complex (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARISON OF DIRECT STENTING VERSUS PRE-DILATION OUTCOMES IN PRIMARY PCI AT A MAJOR HOSPITAL — Maryum Masoud, Farah Shireen · Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS