An object numbering task reveals an underestimation of complexity for typically structured scenes

Our visual environments are composed of an abundance of individual objects. The efficiency with which we can parse such rich environments is remarkable. Previous work suggests that this efficiency is partly explained by grouping mechanisms, which allow the visual system to process the objects that surround us as meaningful groups rather than individual entities. Here, we show that the grouping of objects in typically and meaningfully structured environments directly relates to a reduction of perceived complexity. In an object numerosity discrimination task, we showed participants pairs of schematic scene miniatures, in which objects were structured in typical or atypical ways and asked them to judge which scene consisted of more individual objects. Critically, participants underestimated the number of objects in typically structured compared with atypically structured scenes, suggesting that grouping based on typical object configurations reduces the perceived numerical complexity of a scene. In two control experiments, we show that this overestimation also occurs when the objects are presented on textured backgrounds, and that it is specific to upright scenes, indicating that it is not related to basic visual feature differences between typically and atypically structured scenes. Together, our results suggest that our visual surroundings appear less complex to the visual system than the number of objects in them makes us believe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02577-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An object numbering task reveals an underestimation of complexity for typically structured scenes

Daniel Kaiser, Alex Carter
1 citations
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
0.34
article

An object numbering task reveals an underestimation of complexity for typically structured scenes

Daniel Kaiser, Alex Carter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our visual environments are composed of an abundance of individual objects. The efficiency with which we can parse such rich environments is remarkable. Previous work suggests that this efficiency is partly explained by grouping mechanisms, which allow the visual system to process the objects that surround us as meaningful groups rather than individual entities. Here, we show that the grouping of objects in typically and meaningfully structured environments directly relates to a reduction of perceived complexity. In an object numerosity discrimination task, we showed participants pairs of schematic scene miniatures, in which objects were structured in typical or atypical ways and asked them to judge which scene consisted of more individual objects. Critically, participants underestimated the number of objects in typically structured compared with atypically structured scenes, suggesting that grouping based on typical object configurations reduces the perceived numerical complexity of a scene. In two control experiments, we show that this overestimation also occurs when the objects are presented on textured backgrounds, and that it is specific to upright scenes, indicating that it is not related to basic visual feature differences between typically and atypically structured scenes. Together, our results suggest that our visual surroundings appear less complex to the visual system than the number of objects in them makes us believe.

Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewVol. 32(2)
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), University of York (GB)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An object numbering task reveals an underestimation of complexity for typically structured scenes — Daniel Kaiser, Alex Carter · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS