A Responsibility Pillar: Exploring and Assessing Decentralized Intelligence

The concept of responsible decentralized intelligence (RDI) emerges from the integration of foundation models (FMs) and blockchain technology. This integration offers substantial potential for enhancing computational efficiency and data processing capabilities. However, the lack of a clear understanding of the extent of responsibility in this context raises concerns from users, posing challenges to their widespread adoption. In this paper, we undertake an initial analysis of the connotation of RDI. First, we systematically deconstruct the constituent elements of FM and blockchain, which collectively form the basis of DI, to discern commonalities and distinctions and offer tailored analyses. Then, we introduce a structured framework for evaluating the scope of responsibilities and establishing a set of reconsidered properties that center around responsibility. Last, we conduct an analysis of such identified criteria in DI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/blockchain62396.2024.00061
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Responsibility Pillar: Exploring and Assessing Decentralized Intelligence

Shiping Chen, Tingting Bi, Guangsheng Yu, H. M. N. Dilum Bandara et al.
1 citations
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
2.23
article

A Responsibility Pillar: Exploring and Assessing Decentralized Intelligence

Shiping Chen, Tingting Bi, Guangsheng Yu, H. M. N. Dilum Bandara, Qin Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The concept of responsible decentralized intelligence (RDI) emerges from the integration of foundation models (FMs) and blockchain technology. This integration offers substantial potential for enhancing computational efficiency and data processing capabilities. However, the lack of a clear understanding of the extent of responsibility in this context raises concerns from users, posing challenges to their widespread adoption. In this paper, we undertake an initial analysis of the connotation of RDI. First, we systematically deconstruct the constituent elements of FM and blockchain, which collectively form the basis of DI, to discern commonalities and distinctions and offer tailored analyses. Then, we introduce a structured framework for evaluating the scope of responsibilities and establishing a set of reconsidered properties that center around responsibility. Last, we conduct an analysis of such identified criteria in DI.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Data61 (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.