Contrastive and Non-Contrastive Strategies for Federated Self-Supervised Representation Learning and Deep Clustering

We investigate federated self-supervised representation learning (FedSSRL) and federated clustering (FedCl), aiming to derive low-dimensional representations of datasets distributed across multiple clients, potentially in a heterogeneous manner. Our proposed solutions for both FedSSRL and FedCl involves a comparative analysis from a broad learning context. In particular, we show that a two-stage model, beginning with representation learning and followed by clustering, is an effective learning strategy for both tasks. Notably, integrating a contrastive loss as regularizer significantly boosts performance, even if the task is representation learning. Moreover, for FedCl, a contrastive loss is most effective in both stages, whereas FedSSRL benefits more from a non-contrastive loss. These findings are corroborated by extensive experiments on various image datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jstsp.2024.3461311
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrastive and Non-Contrastive Strategies for Federated Self-Supervised Representation Learning and Deep Clustering

Runxuan Miao, Erdem Koyuncu
2 citations
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
0.69
article

Contrastive and Non-Contrastive Strategies for Federated Self-Supervised Representation Learning and Deep Clustering

Runxuan Miao, Erdem Koyuncu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We investigate federated self-supervised representation learning (FedSSRL) and federated clustering (FedCl), aiming to derive low-dimensional representations of datasets distributed across multiple clients, potentially in a heterogeneous manner. Our proposed solutions for both FedSSRL and FedCl involves a comparative analysis from a broad learning context. In particular, we show that a two-stage model, beginning with representation learning and followed by clustering, is an effective learning strategy for both tasks. Notably, integrating a contrastive loss as regularizer significantly boosts performance, even if the task is representation learning. Moreover, for FedCl, a contrastive loss is most effective in both stages, whereas FedSSRL benefits more from a non-contrastive loss. These findings are corroborated by extensive experiments on various image datasets.

IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal ProcessingVol. 18(6)
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.