Towards Efficient Neuro-Symbolic AI: From Workload Characterization to Hardware Architecture

The remarkable advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), primarily driven by deep neural networks, are facing challenges surrounding unsustainable computational trajectories, limited robustness, and a lack of explainability. To develop next-generation cognitive AI systems, neuro-symbolic AI emerges as a promising paradigm, fusing neural and symbolic approaches to enhance interpretability, robustness, and trustworthiness, while facilitating learning from much less data. Recent neuro-symbolic systems have demonstrated great potential in collaborative human-AI scenarios with reasoning and cognitive capabilities. In this paper, we aim to understand the workload characteristics and potential architectures for neuro-symbolic AI. We first systematically categorize neuro-symbolic AI algorithms, and then experimentally evaluate and analyze them in terms of runtime, memory, computational operators, sparsity, and system characteristics on CPUs, GPUs, and edge SoCs. Our studies reveal that neuro-symbolic models suffer from inefficiencies on off-the-shelf hardware, due to the memory-bound nature of vector-symbolic and logical operations, complex flow control, data dependencies, sparsity variations, and limited scalability. Based on profiling insights, we suggest cross-layer optimization solutions and present a hardware acceleration case study for vector-symbolic architecture to improve the performance, efficiency, and scalability of neuro-symbolic computing. Finally, we discuss the challenges and potential future directions of neuro-symbolic AI from both system and architectural perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for artificial intelligence.
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcasai.2024.3462692
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Efficient Neuro-Symbolic AI: From Workload Characterization to Hardware Architecture

Ananda Samajdar, Yingyan Lin, Tushar Krishna, Cheng Wan et al.
14 citations
IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for artificial intelligence.
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
6.85
article

Towards Efficient Neuro-Symbolic AI: From Workload Characterization to Hardware Architecture

Ananda Samajdar, Yingyan Lin, Tushar Krishna, Cheng Wan, Sixu Li, Yonggan Fu, Youbin Kim, Chaojian Li, Zishen Wan, Ritik Raj, Che-Kai Liu, Haoran You, Jan M. Rabaey, Arijit Raychowdhury, Hanchen Yang, Mohamed Ibrahim
article en
14 citations

Abstract

The remarkable advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), primarily driven by deep neural networks, are facing challenges surrounding unsustainable computational trajectories, limited robustness, and a lack of explainability. To develop next-generation cognitive AI systems, neuro-symbolic AI emerges as a promising paradigm, fusing neural and symbolic approaches to enhance interpretability, robustness, and trustworthiness, while facilitating learning from much less data. Recent neuro-symbolic systems have demonstrated great potential in collaborative human-AI scenarios with reasoning and cognitive capabilities. In this paper, we aim to understand the workload characteristics and potential architectures for neuro-symbolic AI. We first systematically categorize neuro-symbolic AI algorithms, and then experimentally evaluate and analyze them in terms of runtime, memory, computational operators, sparsity, and system characteristics on CPUs, GPUs, and edge SoCs. Our studies reveal that neuro-symbolic models suffer from inefficiencies on off-the-shelf hardware, due to the memory-bound nature of vector-symbolic and logical operations, complex flow control, data dependencies, sparsity variations, and limited scalability. Based on profiling insights, we suggest cross-layer optimization solutions and present a hardware acceleration case study for vector-symbolic architecture to improve the performance, efficiency, and scalability of neuro-symbolic computing. Finally, we discuss the challenges and potential future directions of neuro-symbolic AI from both system and architectural perspectives.

IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for artificial intelligence.Vol. 1(1)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), IBM (United States) (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Semiconductor Research Corporation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
6.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.