Comparison of open haemoridectomy (Milligan-Morgan) and HAL-RAR in the treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoids

Background & Objective: Hemorrhoidectomy (HD), either open (Milligan-Morgan) or closed (Ferguson), is the conventional treatment for stages 3 and 4 of the condition. HAL-RAR therapy, a minimally invasive treatment for high-grade hemorrhoids, involves the integration of HAL (hemorrhoidal artery ligation) with a procedure known as mucopexy, which lifts the hemorrhoidal prolapses. The study objective was to compare the efficacy of open hemorrhoidectomy against haemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair (HAL-RAR). Methods: A comparative randomized controlled trial was conducted at general surgery department of Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Hospital Kamra and Pakistan Air Force Hospital Islamabad between June 2021 and December 2022. Total 30 patients diagnosed with hemorrhoids of grades III–IV were assigned randomly to either HAL-RAR (n=15) or hemorrhoidectomy (n=15). Every procedure was a day surgery performed under spinal anesthesia. After 15 days, 30 days, and 6 months patients were re-evaluated. Patients rated their own pain on a visual analog scale. All the data was analyzed by SPSS v 26. Results: Mean age of the participants was 51.3±6.67 years. HAL-RAR group addressed a greater number of prolapsed hemorrhoidal cushions compared to the hemorrhoidectomy group (2.9 vs 2.02, p = 0.001), and the operation took longer in HAL-RAR group (40 min vs 24 min, p = 0.001). HAL-RAR group had less discomfort in the first 30 days after surgery (p = 0.001). In addition, higher number of patients in HAL-RAR group reported experiencing relief from pain (VAS = 0) after day 7. By day 15, HAL-RAR group had substantially better symptom resolution than the hemorrhoidectomy group. Resolution of bleeding, prolapse, itching, and soiling occurred sooner in HAL-RAR group than in hemorrhoidectomy group during the 30-day follow-up. Conclusion: The symptoms of haemorrhoids are resolved with less discomfort with HAL-RAR than after hemorrhoidectomy, and recovery time is shorter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Islamabad Medical & Dental College
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v13i3.1124
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of open haemoridectomy (Milligan-Morgan) and HAL-RAR in the treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoids

Nauman Anwar Rana, Irmaghana Basharat, Umar Fayyaz Ghani, Atia Khatoon et al.
Journal of Islamabad Medical & Dental College
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

Comparison of open haemoridectomy (Milligan-Morgan) and HAL-RAR in the treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoids

Nauman Anwar Rana, Irmaghana Basharat, Umar Fayyaz Ghani, Atia Khatoon, Rehan Haider, Muhammad Nazim Khan
article en

Abstract

Background & Objective: Hemorrhoidectomy (HD), either open (Milligan-Morgan) or closed (Ferguson), is the conventional treatment for stages 3 and 4 of the condition. HAL-RAR therapy, a minimally invasive treatment for high-grade hemorrhoids, involves the integration of HAL (hemorrhoidal artery ligation) with a procedure known as mucopexy, which lifts the hemorrhoidal prolapses. The study objective was to compare the efficacy of open hemorrhoidectomy against haemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair (HAL-RAR). Methods: A comparative randomized controlled trial was conducted at general surgery department of Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Hospital Kamra and Pakistan Air Force Hospital Islamabad between June 2021 and December 2022. Total 30 patients diagnosed with hemorrhoids of grades III–IV were assigned randomly to either HAL-RAR (n=15) or hemorrhoidectomy (n=15). Every procedure was a day surgery performed under spinal anesthesia. After 15 days, 30 days, and 6 months patients were re-evaluated. Patients rated their own pain on a visual analog scale. All the data was analyzed by SPSS v 26. Results: Mean age of the participants was 51.3±6.67 years. HAL-RAR group addressed a greater number of prolapsed hemorrhoidal cushions compared to the hemorrhoidectomy group (2.9 vs 2.02, p = 0.001), and the operation took longer in HAL-RAR group (40 min vs 24 min, p = 0.001). HAL-RAR group had less discomfort in the first 30 days after surgery (p = 0.001). In addition, higher number of patients in HAL-RAR group reported experiencing relief from pain (VAS = 0) after day 7. By day 15, HAL-RAR group had substantially better symptom resolution than the hemorrhoidectomy group. Resolution of bleeding, prolapse, itching, and soiling occurred sooner in HAL-RAR group than in hemorrhoidectomy group during the 30-day follow-up. Conclusion: The symptoms of haemorrhoids are resolved with less discomfort with HAL-RAR than after hemorrhoidectomy, and recovery time is shorter.

Journal of Islamabad Medical & Dental CollegeVol. 13(3)
Air University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.