Culture Level Quotient (CLQ) 2025

The deficiency of today’s science and mathematics becomes obvious from the point of view of the 16 Methods of Reason of Culture Level Quotient (CLQ) of post-science. Post-science has bridged the gap between mathematical and/or logical rigor and reality. The scientific method based on empirical verification is not the only method for discovering knowledge of reality. Methods of reason accept different standards of rigor under different cultures. In particular, social and life sciences involve infinity and permanence, which cannot be empirically verified, and their solutions need to be accepted based on complete mathematical and/or logical rigor. There are 16 distinct methods of reasoning that can be identified and can be used to measure the cultural level of a person or a society. The 16 Methods of Reason are the combination of the 4 basic methods of reasoning: 1) Logic, 2) Mathematics, 3) Empirical Verification, and 4) Faith, each of which has 2 forms: 1) Incomplete and 2) Complete and two types: 1) Exact and 2) Fuzzy. The 16 Methods of Reason are arranged in the order of cultural level from the lowest 1 dealing with problems of lowest complexity to the highest 16 dealing with problems of greatest complexity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Philosophy and History
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22158/jrph.v7n2p96
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Culture Level Quotient (CLQ) 2025

Chien Yi Lee, Mahadi Hasan
Journal of Research in Philosophy and History
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Culture Level Quotient (CLQ) 2025

Chien Yi Lee, Mahadi Hasan
article en

Abstract

The deficiency of today’s science and mathematics becomes obvious from the point of view of the 16 Methods of Reason of Culture Level Quotient (CLQ) of post-science. Post-science has bridged the gap between mathematical and/or logical rigor and reality. The scientific method based on empirical verification is not the only method for discovering knowledge of reality. Methods of reason accept different standards of rigor under different cultures. In particular, social and life sciences involve infinity and permanence, which cannot be empirically verified, and their solutions need to be accepted based on complete mathematical and/or logical rigor. There are 16 distinct methods of reasoning that can be identified and can be used to measure the cultural level of a person or a society. The 16 Methods of Reason are the combination of the 4 basic methods of reasoning: 1) Logic, 2) Mathematics, 3) Empirical Verification, and 4) Faith, each of which has 2 forms: 1) Incomplete and 2) Complete and two types: 1) Exact and 2) Fuzzy. The 16 Methods of Reason are arranged in the order of cultural level from the lowest 1 dealing with problems of lowest complexity to the highest 16 dealing with problems of greatest complexity.

Journal of Research in Philosophy and HistoryVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.