Extractivism triggering new forms of governance for the rights of nature: The case of Northwest Ecuador

• New forms of extractivism raise new forms of governance through resistance. • Extractivism triggers socio-organizational processes. • Actions by organized communities to invoke the RoN through legal litigation are yielding fruits. • Local governments and communities’ governance efforts are stymied by institutional gaps and mismatches. • Need to conceptualise governance processes grounded in local communities’ struggles. The intensification of resource extractivism around the world poses multiple challenges and fosters the development of new governance structures, especially among communities on the frontlines of resource extraction. Through a narrative inquiry based on narrative interviews with local actors and experts, this article centres on governance as a resistance strategy of local, frontline, communities in the Ecuadorian Northwest Pichincha and Imbabura provinces. The narratives give insights into: a) How new processes of governance are triggered by mining conflict and, in particular, how governance is shaped and manifested; b) Governance challenges faced by local governments and communities; and c) Lessons and recommendations for governance and how these contribute to the discussion of post-extractivism alternatives. New governance processes are shaped through socio-organisational processes and the strengthening of associations and civil society organisations; the institutionalisation of private, civil society, and community conservation initiatives; as well as the actions of the organised community to successfully invoke the Rights of Nature (RoN) through legal litigation. Institutional gaps that reflect competing visions of development are seen as governance challenges by local government and community members. Overall, this study highlights the critical role of governance structures and instruments rooted in frontline community perspectives, offering pathways for the development of post-extractivism alternatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104111
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extractivism triggering new forms of governance for the rights of nature: The case of Northwest Ecuador

Tobías Plieninger, Claudia Coral, Valerie Graw, Stefan Sieber
8 citations
Geoforum
Mining and Resource Management
2.12
article

Extractivism triggering new forms of governance for the rights of nature: The case of Northwest Ecuador

Tobías Plieninger, Claudia Coral, Valerie Graw, Stefan Sieber
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• New forms of extractivism raise new forms of governance through resistance. • Extractivism triggers socio-organizational processes. • Actions by organized communities to invoke the RoN through legal litigation are yielding fruits. • Local governments and communities’ governance efforts are stymied by institutional gaps and mismatches. • Need to conceptualise governance processes grounded in local communities’ struggles. The intensification of resource extractivism around the world poses multiple challenges and fosters the development of new governance structures, especially among communities on the frontlines of resource extraction. Through a narrative inquiry based on narrative interviews with local actors and experts, this article centres on governance as a resistance strategy of local, frontline, communities in the Ecuadorian Northwest Pichincha and Imbabura provinces. The narratives give insights into: a) How new processes of governance are triggered by mining conflict and, in particular, how governance is shaped and manifested; b) Governance challenges faced by local governments and communities; and c) Lessons and recommendations for governance and how these contribute to the discussion of post-extractivism alternatives. New governance processes are shaped through socio-organisational processes and the strengthening of associations and civil society organisations; the institutionalisation of private, civil society, and community conservation initiatives; as well as the actions of the organised community to successfully invoke the Rights of Nature (RoN) through legal litigation. Institutional gaps that reflect competing visions of development are seen as governance challenges by local government and community members. Overall, this study highlights the critical role of governance structures and instruments rooted in frontline community perspectives, offering pathways for the development of post-extractivism alternatives.

GeoforumVol. 156
University of Kassel (DE), University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mining and Resource Management
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.