Stealing the seabed. The Canadian State and the question of Rights and Title over submerged lands

Recognising the seabed as a space of contested Rights and Title requires the Canadian State to fundamentally change its approach to the territories of Indigenous peoples. In 2023, the Canadian State declared an effective moratorium on deep-sea mining within its jurisdiction. While the importance of establishing environmental regulations has been recognised, discussion of access and Indigenous Rights and Title relating to the seafloor is lacking. This is despite challenges to State claims of sovereignty over, and activities pertaining to the seabed being increasingly invoked in the Canadian courts. Indigenous Rights over the seabed complicate State expressions of sovereignty over stolen and unceded marine scapes. However, the State’s definitions of “land” over which Rights are conferred—and the placement of the burden of proof onto Indigenous peoples—only serves to replicate colonial and racial logics of Indigenous peoples as static, both geographically and temporally. In contrast the State affords itself the potential to be flexible, including in how it mobilises the ocean's geo-physical characterstics, as new and emerging industries shape discussions of the seabed as a site of extraction. Instead of extending policies and practices that have been extensively critiqued in relation to terrestrial land, the current moratorium offers an opportunity to reconsider how the State operates with regards to the marine space. Engagement with these questions is necessary, lest the dispossession and theft that occur on land and offshore are continued and repeated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104108
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stealing the seabed. The Canadian State and the question of Rights and Title over submerged lands

Erika R. Gavenus, Rosanna Carver, Johnnie Manson
2 citations
Geoforum
International Maritime Law Issues
1.42
article

Stealing the seabed. The Canadian State and the question of Rights and Title over submerged lands

Erika R. Gavenus, Rosanna Carver, Johnnie Manson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recognising the seabed as a space of contested Rights and Title requires the Canadian State to fundamentally change its approach to the territories of Indigenous peoples. In 2023, the Canadian State declared an effective moratorium on deep-sea mining within its jurisdiction. While the importance of establishing environmental regulations has been recognised, discussion of access and Indigenous Rights and Title relating to the seafloor is lacking. This is despite challenges to State claims of sovereignty over, and activities pertaining to the seabed being increasingly invoked in the Canadian courts. Indigenous Rights over the seabed complicate State expressions of sovereignty over stolen and unceded marine scapes. However, the State’s definitions of “land” over which Rights are conferred—and the placement of the burden of proof onto Indigenous peoples—only serves to replicate colonial and racial logics of Indigenous peoples as static, both geographically and temporally. In contrast the State affords itself the potential to be flexible, including in how it mobilises the ocean's geo-physical characterstics, as new and emerging industries shape discussions of the seabed as a site of extraction. Instead of extending policies and practices that have been extensively critiqued in relation to terrestrial land, the current moratorium offers an opportunity to reconsider how the State operates with regards to the marine space. Engagement with these questions is necessary, lest the dispossession and theft that occur on land and offshore are continued and repeated.

GeoforumVol. 156
University of British Columbia (CA), University of California, Davis (US)
University of British Columbia
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
International Maritime Law Issues
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.