Imported malaria in a non-endemic country: sixteen years of cases in a hospital in the South of Madrid, Spain
In this study, 132 patients (23.7% of all suspected) were diagnosed with malaria. The PCR was the most sensitive technique (99.2%), followed by antigen detection (78.8%) and microscopy (75%), with Plasmodium falciparum being the predominant species (94.7%). VFR was the largest group infected with malaria (69.7%), mostly symptomatic (98.2%) and presenting MM (90.2%). Instead, MRA patients (25%) presented milder (47.4%) or no symptoms (31.6%) and higher cases of SMM (42.4%). Coinfection with another imported pathogen was present in 19 patients (14.4%), being MRA more frequently coinfected (30.3%) CONCLUSION: This study shows the need for establishing systems for VFRs to attend pre-travel consultations to reduce malaria imported risk. In the case of MRA, screening for imported diseases should be conducted upon their arrival. Finally, we highlight two cases of co-infection with imported viruses, showing that presence of symptoms resembling malaria from another imported pathogen does not exclude malaria.
Authors
- F. Merino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9180-2479)
- José Miguel Rubio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1903-6711)
- Jorge Ligero-López (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4039-2638)
- Beatriz Valle Borrego (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8512-6283)
- Víctor Antón-Berenguer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7484-6987)
- Irene Cabrera-Rodrigo
- Sara Gómez-de-Frutos
Institutions
- Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
- Centro Nacional de Microbiologia (ES)
- Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2024-09-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-024-04938-0
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Malaria Research and Control
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.09
Funders
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III