Age-Specific Reference Intervals for Thyroid-Stimulating Hormones and Free Thyroxine to Optimize Diagnosis of Thyroid Disease

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and subsequent free thyroxine (FT4) concentrations outside the reference interval (RI) are used to diagnose thyroid diseases. Most laboratories do not provide age-specific RIs for TSH and FT4 beyond childhood, although TSH concentrations vary with age. Therefore, we aimed to establish TSH and FT4 age-specific RIs throughout life and aimed to determine whether using these RIs would result in reclassification of thyroid disease diagnoses in adults. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study used big data to determine indirect RIs for TSH and FT4. These RIs were determined by TMC and refineR-analysis, respectively, using four different immunoassay platforms (Roche, Abbott, Siemens, and Beckman Coulter). Retrospective data (2008-2022) from 13 Dutch laboratories for general practitioners and local hospitals were used. RIs were evaluated per manufacturer. Age groups were established from 2 to 20 years by 2-year categories and decade categories between 20 and 100 years. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We included totally 7.6 million TSH and 2.2 million FT4 requests. TSH upper reference limits (URLs) and FT4 lower reference limits were higher in early childhood and decreased toward adulthood. In adulthood, TSH URLs increased from 60 years in men, and from 50 years in women, while FT4 URLs increased from 70 years onward. Using adult age-specific RIs resulted in a decrease in diagnoses of subclinical and overt hypothyroidism in women above 50 and men above 60 years in our Roche dataset. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study stressed the known importance of using age-specific RIs for TSH and FT4 in children. This study also showed the clinical relevance of using age-specific RIs for TSH in adulthood to reduce diagnoses of subclinical hypothyroidism in older persons. Therefore, implementation of adult TSH age-specific RIs should be strongly considered. Data are less uniform regarding FT4 age-specific RIs and more research should be performed before implementing these in clinical practice.