Reported Side Effects and Adherence of Daily HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Users in Ontario, Canada: An Analysis of the Ontario Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Cohort Study

Side effects are a common concern of current and potential HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users, potentially leading to missed doses. We examined the relationship between reported side effects and adherence in the Ontario PrEP Cohort Study (ON-PrEP). In total, 600 predominantly gay (87.3%), White (65.8%), and male (95.0%) participants completed questionnaires assessing the presence and severity of five side effect categories (nausea, diarrhea, headache, abdominal pain, and "other") as well as their adherence to daily PrEP (any missed doses in the previous 4 days). In total, 175 participants (29%) ever reported experiencing side effects: most commonly diarrhea (7.5% of study visits), and most were of mild severity. Lower incomes (<i>p</i> = 0.01), identifying as bisexual (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and baseline concern about side effects (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were associated with ever reporting side effects. The odds of reporting any side effects decreased by a factor of 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.25-0.80) with each additional year of PrEP use, however 1 in 10 participants still reported side effects after 1 year of use. The odds of reporting optimal adherence were 0.48 (0.28-0.83) times lower for participants reporting any side effects, 0.67 (0.51-0.89) times lower per additional side effect category reported, and 0.78 (0.65-0.97) times lower per incremental increase in side effect severity ratings. We found some evidence of interaction between side effect measures and duration of PrEP use, suggesting that these relationships were stronger for participants taking PrEP for longer. Clinicians should make efforts to ascertain patients' experience of side effects and consider risk counseling and alternative PrEP regimens to promote adherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIDS Patient Care and STDs
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2024.0144
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reported Side Effects and Adherence of Daily HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Users in Ontario, Canada: An Analysis of the Ontario Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Cohort Study

Alan Li, Fanta Ongoïba, Garfield Durrant, John Macleod et al.
AIDS Patient Care and STDs
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Reported Side Effects and Adherence of Daily HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Users in Ontario, Canada: An Analysis of the Ontario Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Cohort Study

Alan Li, Fanta Ongoïba, Garfield Durrant, John Macleod, Sean D. Sullivan, Mia J. Biondi, Darrell H. S. Tan, Ryan Lisk, David Knox, Paul MacPherson, Isaac I. Bogoch, Matthew W McGarrity, Andrew Schonbe, Deanna Clatworthy, Kevin Woodward, Jeff Reinhart, Ann N. Burchell, Monica Rudd
article en

Abstract

Side effects are a common concern of current and potential HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users, potentially leading to missed doses. We examined the relationship between reported side effects and adherence in the Ontario PrEP Cohort Study (ON-PrEP). In total, 600 predominantly gay (87.3%), White (65.8%), and male (95.0%) participants completed questionnaires assessing the presence and severity of five side effect categories (nausea, diarrhea, headache, abdominal pain, and "other") as well as their adherence to daily PrEP (any missed doses in the previous 4 days). In total, 175 participants (29%) ever reported experiencing side effects: most commonly diarrhea (7.5% of study visits), and most were of mild severity. Lower incomes (<i>p</i> = 0.01), identifying as bisexual (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and baseline concern about side effects (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were associated with ever reporting side effects. The odds of reporting any side effects decreased by a factor of 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.25-0.80) with each additional year of PrEP use, however 1 in 10 participants still reported side effects after 1 year of use. The odds of reporting optimal adherence were 0.48 (0.28-0.83) times lower for participants reporting any side effects, 0.67 (0.51-0.89) times lower per additional side effect category reported, and 0.78 (0.65-0.97) times lower per incremental increase in side effect severity ratings. We found some evidence of interaction between side effect measures and duration of PrEP use, suggesting that these relationships were stronger for participants taking PrEP for longer. Clinicians should make efforts to ascertain patients' experience of side effects and consider risk counseling and alternative PrEP regimens to promote adherence.

AIDS Patient Care and STDsVol. 38(9)
University College Dublin (IE), University Health Network (CA), Ontario Ministry of Labour (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), Toronto Public Health (CA), University of Toronto (CA), York University (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Toronto General Hospital (CA), Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program (CA), Canadian Respiratory Research Network (CA), Health Solutions (Sweden) (SE), Bay Clinic (US), Maple Leaf Medical Clinic (CA), START Clinic (CA), St Michael’s Hospital (GB), Greo (CA), Ontario HIV Treatment Network (CA), AIDS Committee of Toronto (CA), Black Coalition for AIDS Prevention (CA), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.