Using grass inflorescence as source material for biomonitoring through environmental DNA metabarcoding

The observed biases could be explained by the accidental inclusion of invertebrate specimens during sample collection and DNA extraction. Primer biases towards the amplified taxa could be another reason for the observed RRA results. This study provided insight into the invertebrate community associated with the four sampled grass species. It should be noted that with the lack of negative field controls, it is impossible to rule out the influence of airborne eDNA on the observed diversity associated with each grass species. The lack of the inclusion of PCR and extraction blanks in the sequencing step, as well as the inclusion of negative field controls, including other areas for refinement were highlighted, and suggestions were provided to improve the outcomes of future studies.