Evaluation of biocompatibility and osseointegration of multi‐component TiAl6V4 titanium alloy implants

This study aimed to investigate the biocompatibility and osseointegration of novel titanium (Ti) implants with a perforated part with high surface roughness (Ra >4 μm) and a smooth solid part (test group), as compared to smooth solid Ti implants (control group; Ra < 0.8 μm). Test and control implants were implanted in rabbit femurs. After 4 and 15 weeks, host tissue reaction and quality of tissue formed were evaluated with histopathology, while micro-CT scans were used to quantitatively assess bone-implant contact (BIC), surrounding bone formation, and bone ingrowth. After 4 and 15 weeks, minimal host reaction was found in the test group. Histopathological analysis showed new bone formation around the implants in both the test and control groups after 4 weeks. Furthermore, additional bone growth was often observed within the holes of the test implants. After 15 weeks, the test implants showed high bone ingrowth and the presence of mature bone in direct contact with the implant surface, whereas, bone ingrowth was poorer for the control group with 30% of the control implants, showing larger gaps at the bone-implant interface. Quantitative micro-CT analysis revealed comparable BIC and bone formation in both groups at 4 weeks, but higher BIC and more bone formation in the test group than in the control group after 15 weeks. No significant differences were observed in any of the analyses. In conclusion, partially perforated, high-roughness Ti implants showed excellent osseointegration and minimal host reaction, indicating their potential for orthopedic applications in bone repair and regeneration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25974
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of biocompatibility and osseointegration of multi‐component TiAl6V4 titanium alloy implants

Maria-Ioana Pastrama, Rossana Schipani, S.M. Ahmadi, Banafsheh Sajadi et al.
7 citations
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
1.29
article

Evaluation of biocompatibility and osseointegration of multi‐component TiAl6V4 titanium alloy implants

Maria-Ioana Pastrama, Rossana Schipani, S.M. Ahmadi, Banafsheh Sajadi, Zaina Jacobs
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the biocompatibility and osseointegration of novel titanium (Ti) implants with a perforated part with high surface roughness (Ra >4 μm) and a smooth solid part (test group), as compared to smooth solid Ti implants (control group; Ra < 0.8 μm). Test and control implants were implanted in rabbit femurs. After 4 and 15 weeks, host tissue reaction and quality of tissue formed were evaluated with histopathology, while micro-CT scans were used to quantitatively assess bone-implant contact (BIC), surrounding bone formation, and bone ingrowth. After 4 and 15 weeks, minimal host reaction was found in the test group. Histopathological analysis showed new bone formation around the implants in both the test and control groups after 4 weeks. Furthermore, additional bone growth was often observed within the holes of the test implants. After 15 weeks, the test implants showed high bone ingrowth and the presence of mature bone in direct contact with the implant surface, whereas, bone ingrowth was poorer for the control group with 30% of the control implants, showing larger gaps at the bone-implant interface. Quantitative micro-CT analysis revealed comparable BIC and bone formation in both groups at 4 weeks, but higher BIC and more bone formation in the test group than in the control group after 15 weeks. No significant differences were observed in any of the analyses. In conclusion, partially perforated, high-roughness Ti implants showed excellent osseointegration and minimal host reaction, indicating their potential for orthopedic applications in bone repair and regeneration.

Journal of Orthopaedic Research®Vol. 43(1)
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.