A standardized framework to test event-based experiments

The replication crisis in experimental psychology and neuroscience has received much attention recently. This has led to wide acceptance of measures to improve scientific practices, such as preregistration and registered reports. Less effort has been devoted to performing and reporting the results of systematic tests of the functioning of the experimental setup itself. Yet, inaccuracies in the performance of the experimental setup may affect the results of a study, lead to replication failures, and importantly, impede the ability to integrate results across studies. Prompted by challenges we experienced when deploying studies across six laboratories collecting electroencephalography (EEG)/magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and intracranial EEG (iEEG), here we describe a framework for both testing and reporting the performance of the experimental setup. In addition, 100 researchers were surveyed to provide a snapshot of current common practices and community standards concerning testing in published experiments' setups. Most researchers reported testing their experimental setups. Almost none, however, published the tests performed or their results. Tests were diverse, targeting different aspects of the setup. Through simulations, we clearly demonstrate how even slight inaccuracies can impact the final results. We end with a standardized, open-source, step-by-step protocol for testing (visual) event-related experiments, shared via protocols.io. The protocol aims to provide researchers with a benchmark for future replications and insights into the research quality to help improve the reproducibility of results, accelerate multicenter studies, increase robustness, and enable integration across studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02508-y
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A standardized framework to test event-based experiments

Lucía Melloni, Liad Mudrik, Alex Lepauvre, Rony Hirschhorn et al.
4 citations
Behavior Research Methods
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
1.37
article

A standardized framework to test event-based experiments

Lucía Melloni, Liad Mudrik, Alex Lepauvre, Rony Hirschhorn, Katarina Bendtz
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The replication crisis in experimental psychology and neuroscience has received much attention recently. This has led to wide acceptance of measures to improve scientific practices, such as preregistration and registered reports. Less effort has been devoted to performing and reporting the results of systematic tests of the functioning of the experimental setup itself. Yet, inaccuracies in the performance of the experimental setup may affect the results of a study, lead to replication failures, and importantly, impede the ability to integrate results across studies. Prompted by challenges we experienced when deploying studies across six laboratories collecting electroencephalography (EEG)/magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and intracranial EEG (iEEG), here we describe a framework for both testing and reporting the performance of the experimental setup. In addition, 100 researchers were surveyed to provide a snapshot of current common practices and community standards concerning testing in published experiments' setups. Most researchers reported testing their experimental setups. Almost none, however, published the tests performed or their results. Tests were diverse, targeting different aspects of the setup. Through simulations, we clearly demonstrate how even slight inaccuracies can impact the final results. We end with a standardized, open-source, step-by-step protocol for testing (visual) event-related experiments, shared via protocols.io. The protocol aims to provide researchers with a benchmark for future replications and insights into the research quality to help improve the reproducibility of results, accelerate multicenter studies, increase robustness, and enable integration across studies.

Behavior Research MethodsVol. 56(8)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Tel Aviv University (IL), Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics (DE), New York University (US)
Templeton World Charity Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.