Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery in Lymphatic Reconstruction

Lymphatic reconstruction entails microsurgery of the smallest human vessels with little microsurgical error tolerance. Surgical outcomes are therefore tightly tied to microsurgical performances and can be restricted by physiologic tremor or muscle tiring throughout extensive procedures. Recently introduced highly specialized microsurgical robots are promising to help overcome these human limitations, particularly relevant for lymphatic microsurgery. Ideal indications and setups for these robotic systems, however, are not yet well established. Reviewing the first 5 years of clinical experience with these microsurgical robots revealed a total of 204 robotically performed lymphatic anastomoses. Most reported use cases (84.4%) involved microsurgical reconstructions of lymphatic flow at the upper and lower extremities, of which 42% of patients were treated for breast cancer-related lymphedema. Considering rising cancer incidences and survival rates, these numbers highlight the potential of robotic-assisted microsurgery for this patient group, whereas the concept of robotic-assisted microsurgery per se can aid surgeons to achieve a new level of microsurgical excellence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010608
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Lymphatic System and Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery in Lymphatic Reconstruction

Bohdan Pomahač, Viola A. Stögner, Haripriya S. Ayyala, Dean M. Pucciarelli
3 citations
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Lymphatic System and Diseases
0.85
article

Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery in Lymphatic Reconstruction

Bohdan Pomahač, Viola A. Stögner, Haripriya S. Ayyala, Dean M. Pucciarelli
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Lymphatic reconstruction entails microsurgery of the smallest human vessels with little microsurgical error tolerance. Surgical outcomes are therefore tightly tied to microsurgical performances and can be restricted by physiologic tremor or muscle tiring throughout extensive procedures. Recently introduced highly specialized microsurgical robots are promising to help overcome these human limitations, particularly relevant for lymphatic microsurgery. Ideal indications and setups for these robotic systems, however, are not yet well established. Reviewing the first 5 years of clinical experience with these microsurgical robots revealed a total of 204 robotically performed lymphatic anastomoses. Most reported use cases (84.4%) involved microsurgical reconstructions of lymphatic flow at the upper and lower extremities, of which 42% of patients were treated for breast cancer-related lymphedema. Considering rising cancer incidences and survival rates, these numbers highlight the potential of robotic-assisted microsurgery for this patient group, whereas the concept of robotic-assisted microsurgery per se can aid surgeons to achieve a new level of microsurgical excellence.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 36(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Yale New Haven Hospital (US), Johnson University (US), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Lymphatic System and Diseases
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery in Lymphatic Reconstruction — Bohdan Pomahač, Viola A. Stögner, et al. · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS