<i>How Might we Build an Equitable Future?</i> Design Justice, a Counternarrative to Dominant Approaches in Medical Education

<b><i>Phenomenon: </i></b> Marginalized individuals in medicine face many structural inequities which can have enduring consequences on their progress. Therefore, inequity must be addressed by dismantling underlying unjust policies, environments, and curricula. However, once these injustices have been taken apart, how do we build more just systems from the rubble? Many current strategies to address this question have foundational values of urgency, solutionism, and top-down leadership. <b><i>Approach: </i></b>This paper explores a counternarrative: Design Justice. As a set of guiding principles, Design Justice centers the experiences and perspectives of marginalized individuals and communities. These principles include mutual accountability and transparency, co-ownership, and community-led outcomes, and honoring local, traditional, Indigenous knowledge. <b><i>Findings: </i></b>Rooted in critical scholarship and critical design, Design Justice recognizes the interconnectedness of various forms of marginalization and works to critically examine power dynamics that exist in every design process. These co-created principles act as practical guardrails, directing progress toward justice. <b><i>Insights: </i></b>This paper begins with an overview of Design Justice's history in critical scholarship and critical design, providing foundational background knowledge for medical educators, scholars, and leaders in key concepts of justice and design. We explore how the Design Justice principles were developed and have been applied across sectors, highlighting its applications, including education applications. Finally, we raise critical questions about medical education prompted by Design Justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2024.2404008
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Might we Build an Equitable Future? Design Justice, a Counternarrative to Dominant Approaches in Medical Education

Albert Shanker, Laura Lockwood, Daniel C. West, Hannah Anderson et al.
5 citations
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Diversity and Career in Medicine
4.65
article

How Might we Build an Equitable Future? Design Justice, a Counternarrative to Dominant Approaches in Medical Education

Albert Shanker, Laura Lockwood, Daniel C. West, Hannah Anderson, Anna Weiss, Kathryn Kalata, April Edwell, Dorene F. Balmer, Emily Borman-Shoap, Meghan O’Connor, Rachel Stork Poeppelman, Johannah M. Scheurer, Patricia M. Hobday, Matt Pearce, Xandro Xu, Courtney Karol, Pricilla Cabral, Joshua Rosenfeld
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Phenomenon: </i></b> Marginalized individuals in medicine face many structural inequities which can have enduring consequences on their progress. Therefore, inequity must be addressed by dismantling underlying unjust policies, environments, and curricula. However, once these injustices have been taken apart, how do we build more just systems from the rubble? Many current strategies to address this question have foundational values of urgency, solutionism, and top-down leadership. <b><i>Approach: </i></b>This paper explores a counternarrative: Design Justice. As a set of guiding principles, Design Justice centers the experiences and perspectives of marginalized individuals and communities. These principles include mutual accountability and transparency, co-ownership, and community-led outcomes, and honoring local, traditional, Indigenous knowledge. <b><i>Findings: </i></b>Rooted in critical scholarship and critical design, Design Justice recognizes the interconnectedness of various forms of marginalization and works to critically examine power dynamics that exist in every design process. These co-created principles act as practical guardrails, directing progress toward justice. <b><i>Insights: </i></b>This paper begins with an overview of Design Justice's history in critical scholarship and critical design, providing foundational background knowledge for medical educators, scholars, and leaders in key concepts of justice and design. We explore how the Design Justice principles were developed and have been applied across sectors, highlighting its applications, including education applications. Finally, we raise critical questions about medical education prompted by Design Justice.

Teaching and Learning in MedicineVol. 37(5)
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Utah (US), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), University of California System (US), Department of Health (TW), Center for Neurosciences (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), University of Minnesota Children's Hospital (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
4.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.