Perceptions of carbon dioxide emission reductions and future warming among climate experts

Abstract The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) employs emission scenarios to explore a range of future climate outcomes but refrains from assigning probabilities to individual scenarios. However, IPCC authors have their own views on the likelihood of different climate outcomes, which are valuable to understand because authors possess both expert insight and considerable influence. Here we report the results of a survey of 211 IPCC authors about the likelihood of four key climate outcomes. We found that most authors are skeptical that warming will be limited to the Paris targets of well below 2 °C, but are more optimistic that net zero CO 2 emissions will be reached during the second half of this century. When asked about the beliefs of their peers, author responses showed strong correlations between personal and peer beliefs, suggesting that participants with extreme beliefs perceive their own estimates as closer to the community average than they actually are.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01661-8
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of carbon dioxide emission reductions and future warming among climate experts

Susan Ly, Joeri Rogelj, Steven J. Davis, Kirsten Zickfeld et al.
13 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Climate Change Communication and Perception
14.72
article

Perceptions of carbon dioxide emission reductions and future warming among climate experts

Susan Ly, Joeri Rogelj, Steven J. Davis, Kirsten Zickfeld, Mitchell Dickau, Edward Maibach, H. Damon Matthews, Seth Wynes
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) employs emission scenarios to explore a range of future climate outcomes but refrains from assigning probabilities to individual scenarios. However, IPCC authors have their own views on the likelihood of different climate outcomes, which are valuable to understand because authors possess both expert insight and considerable influence. Here we report the results of a survey of 211 IPCC authors about the likelihood of four key climate outcomes. We found that most authors are skeptical that warming will be limited to the Paris targets of well below 2 °C, but are more optimistic that net zero CO 2 emissions will be reached during the second half of this century. When asked about the beliefs of their peers, author responses showed strong correlations between personal and peer beliefs, suggesting that participants with extreme beliefs perceive their own estimates as closer to the community average than they actually are.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 5(1)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), University of Waterloo (CA), George Mason University (US), Simon Fraser University (CA), Concordia University (US), Imperial College London (GB), Concordia University (CA), Stanford University (US)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
14.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.