P044 TEAM-BASED CARE TO MANAGE COMPLEX CASES OF HYPERTENSION

Background and Objectives: Team-based care that uses home blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring to facilitate hypertension management is safe and effective in lowering BP in routine primary care. However, its usefulness to manage more complex cases of hypertension is uncertain. This 6-month study explores its use in such patients attending a hypertension clinic. Methods: BP telemonitoring consisted of smartphone with BP app paired with wireless home BP device to transmit BP readings to a central server, accessible to patients and clinic staff. Patients were asked to contact the clinic about worrisome home BP readings, treatment problems and technical issues. Home readings were integrated into clinical decision-making. Outcomes were patients’ experience and clinical measures. Results: Of 90 enrolled patients, 38% had grade 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease, 23% diabetes, 31% heart disease, 12% stroke and 12% aortic dissection. Mean number (standard deviation) of co-morbid conditions was 4.2 (2.0). Most patients were at very high (30%) or high risk (50%) for a cardiovascular event. During follow-up, one patient died and one dropped-out of care. Mean number of in-person and virtual assessments by a physician were 1.6 (0.6) and 2.0 (1.8), respectively. Eighty-three percent (n=75) contacted clinic staff. Mean number of contacts for technical reasons was 1.2 (1.8), treatment-related issues 0.5 (1.0) and personal support 4.2 (5.9). From baseline to exit mean automated office BP fell (p<0.001), BP control improved (p<0.001) and mean number of antihypertensive drug classes increased (p=0.049). Most patients, 91% (80/88), felt BP telemonitoring to be a valuable tool for managing their hypertension. Nonetheless, 38% also considered cost to be potentially a barrier to long-term use. Only 6% had data security concerns. Conclusions: Team-based care was highly rated by patients to manage their hypertension and may account for the low drop-out rate, high number of patient-provider contacts, good patient acceptance of more intensified pharmacological treatment and better BP control. However, cost potentially may be a barrier for long-term use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001063048.88937.73
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P044 TEAM-BASED CARE TO MANAGE COMPLEX CASES OF HYPERTENSION

Alexander G. Logan, Inna Lokteva
Journal of Hypertension
Delphi Technique in Research
article

P044 TEAM-BASED CARE TO MANAGE COMPLEX CASES OF HYPERTENSION

Alexander G. Logan, Inna Lokteva
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Team-based care that uses home blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring to facilitate hypertension management is safe and effective in lowering BP in routine primary care. However, its usefulness to manage more complex cases of hypertension is uncertain. This 6-month study explores its use in such patients attending a hypertension clinic. Methods: BP telemonitoring consisted of smartphone with BP app paired with wireless home BP device to transmit BP readings to a central server, accessible to patients and clinic staff. Patients were asked to contact the clinic about worrisome home BP readings, treatment problems and technical issues. Home readings were integrated into clinical decision-making. Outcomes were patients’ experience and clinical measures. Results: Of 90 enrolled patients, 38% had grade 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease, 23% diabetes, 31% heart disease, 12% stroke and 12% aortic dissection. Mean number (standard deviation) of co-morbid conditions was 4.2 (2.0). Most patients were at very high (30%) or high risk (50%) for a cardiovascular event. During follow-up, one patient died and one dropped-out of care. Mean number of in-person and virtual assessments by a physician were 1.6 (0.6) and 2.0 (1.8), respectively. Eighty-three percent (n=75) contacted clinic staff. Mean number of contacts for technical reasons was 1.2 (1.8), treatment-related issues 0.5 (1.0) and personal support 4.2 (5.9). From baseline to exit mean automated office BP fell (p<0.001), BP control improved (p<0.001) and mean number of antihypertensive drug classes increased (p=0.049). Most patients, 91% (80/88), felt BP telemonitoring to be a valuable tool for managing their hypertension. Nonetheless, 38% also considered cost to be potentially a barrier to long-term use. Only 6% had data security concerns. Conclusions: Team-based care was highly rated by patients to manage their hypertension and may account for the low drop-out rate, high number of patient-provider contacts, good patient acceptance of more intensified pharmacological treatment and better BP control. However, cost potentially may be a barrier for long-term use.

Journal of HypertensionVol. 42(Suppl 3)
Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.