The Difference between Traditional Magnetic Stimulation and Microcoil Stimulation: Threshold and the Electric Field Gradient

This paper considers the threshold value of the activating function needed for stimulation in traditional magnetic stimulation and microcoil stimulation. Two analyses of excitation have been studied: spatial frequency analysis and active membrane analysis using the Hodgkin−Huxley model. The activating function depends on the spatial distribution of the electric field gradient in the active membrane analysis and the spatial frequency in the spatial frequency analysis. Both analyses show that a microcoil (tens of microns in size) has a higher threshold than a traditional coil (tens of millimeters in size) when the spatial frequency is large or the spatial extent of the activating function is small. Consequently, the stimulation threshold for a microcoil is much higher than that for a conventional coil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188349
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Difference between Traditional Magnetic Stimulation and Microcoil Stimulation: Threshold and the Electric Field Gradient

Bradley J. Roth, Mohammed Alzahrani
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
0.54
article

The Difference between Traditional Magnetic Stimulation and Microcoil Stimulation: Threshold and the Electric Field Gradient

Bradley J. Roth, Mohammed Alzahrani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper considers the threshold value of the activating function needed for stimulation in traditional magnetic stimulation and microcoil stimulation. Two analyses of excitation have been studied: spatial frequency analysis and active membrane analysis using the Hodgkin−Huxley model. The activating function depends on the spatial distribution of the electric field gradient in the active membrane analysis and the spatial frequency in the spatial frequency analysis. Both analyses show that a microcoil (tens of microns in size) has a higher threshold than a traditional coil (tens of millimeters in size) when the spatial frequency is large or the spatial extent of the activating function is small. Consequently, the stimulation threshold for a microcoil is much higher than that for a conventional coil.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(18)
Oakland University (US)
Taif University
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.