Validity and reliability of the Mobile Toolbox Faces and Names memory test

Validation of the Mobile Toolbox Faces and Names associative memory test is presented. Ninety-two participants self-administered Faces and Names in-person; 956 self-administered Faces and Names remotely but took convergent measures in person; and 123 self-administered Faces and Names remotely twice, 14 days apart. Internal consistency (.76-.79) and test-retest reliability (ICC = .73) were acceptable. Convergent validity with WMS-IV Verbal Paired Associates was satisfactory (immediate .54; delayed .58). The findings suggest the remotely administered Faces and Names is a reliable instrument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuropsychology
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12394
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability of the Mobile Toolbox Faces and Names memory test

Miriam A. Novack, Saki Amagai, Maria Varela Diaz, Zahra Hosseinian et al.
3 citations
Journal of Neuropsychology
Memory Processes and Influences
1.03
article

Validity and reliability of the Mobile Toolbox Faces and Names memory test

Miriam A. Novack, Saki Amagai, Maria Varela Diaz, Zahra Hosseinian, Sarah Pila, Aaron J. Kaat, Richard C Gershon, Jerry Slotkin, Cindy J. Nowinski, Dorene M. Rentz, Rachel L. Nosheny, Elizabeth M. Dworak, Stephanie Ruth Young, Bernard Landavazo, Keith Alperin, Yusuke Shono, Hubert Adam, Anyelo Almonte‐Correa, Michael W. Weiner, Monica R. Camacho
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Validation of the Mobile Toolbox Faces and Names associative memory test is presented. Ninety-two participants self-administered Faces and Names in-person; 956 self-administered Faces and Names remotely but took convergent measures in person; and 123 self-administered Faces and Names remotely twice, 14 days apart. Internal consistency (.76-.79) and test-retest reliability (ICC = .73) were acceptable. Convergent validity with WMS-IV Verbal Paired Associates was satisfactory (immediate .54; delayed .58). The findings suggest the remotely administered Faces and Names is a reliable instrument.

Journal of NeuropsychologyVol. 19(2)
Northwestern University (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Claremont Graduate University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Northern California Institute for Research and Education (US), University of Delaware (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Memory Processes and Influences
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.