Refocusing and Futuring Perspectives on AI in Marketing
In their article entitled “AI is Changing the World: For Better or for Worse?” Grewal, Guha, and Becker imply two symptom-avoidance rather than goal-approach questions: (1) What fundamental societal problems, previously identified in the marketing literature, will AI exacerbate? and (2) How can society remedy these problems? By only considering articles published in prestigious marketing-related journals, their restrictive bottom-up thought-leader-grounded process for deriving answers to these questions is blinkered and somewhat backward-looking. Instead, a top-down approach, driven by preferred-outcome questions like ‘How can marketing best help optimize societal flourishing in a post-scarcity, AI-rich environment?’, may foster comprehensive, extra-disciplinary, future-oriented, and proactive analyses that yield more effective answers. We close by speculating that marketing can survive in a transhuman and AI-rich environment.
Authors
- Vaidas Lukosius
- Michael R. Hyman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6675-8808)
Institutions
- New Mexico State University (US)
- Tennessee State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Macromarketing
- Published
- 2024-09-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467241280364
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- AI in Service Interactions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.08