Refocusing and Futuring Perspectives on AI in Marketing

In their article entitled “AI is Changing the World: For Better or for Worse?” Grewal, Guha, and Becker imply two symptom-avoidance rather than goal-approach questions: (1) What fundamental societal problems, previously identified in the marketing literature, will AI exacerbate? and (2) How can society remedy these problems? By only considering articles published in prestigious marketing-related journals, their restrictive bottom-up thought-leader-grounded process for deriving answers to these questions is blinkered and somewhat backward-looking. Instead, a top-down approach, driven by preferred-outcome questions like ‘How can marketing best help optimize societal flourishing in a post-scarcity, AI-rich environment?’, may foster comprehensive, extra-disciplinary, future-oriented, and proactive analyses that yield more effective answers. We close by speculating that marketing can survive in a transhuman and AI-rich environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Macromarketing
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467241280364
Citations
6
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refocusing and Futuring Perspectives on AI in Marketing

Vaidas Lukosius, Michael R. Hyman
6 citations
Journal of Macromarketing
AI in Service Interactions
2.08
article

Refocusing and Futuring Perspectives on AI in Marketing

Vaidas Lukosius, Michael R. Hyman
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In their article entitled “AI is Changing the World: For Better or for Worse?” Grewal, Guha, and Becker imply two symptom-avoidance rather than goal-approach questions: (1) What fundamental societal problems, previously identified in the marketing literature, will AI exacerbate? and (2) How can society remedy these problems? By only considering articles published in prestigious marketing-related journals, their restrictive bottom-up thought-leader-grounded process for deriving answers to these questions is blinkered and somewhat backward-looking. Instead, a top-down approach, driven by preferred-outcome questions like ‘How can marketing best help optimize societal flourishing in a post-scarcity, AI-rich environment?’, may foster comprehensive, extra-disciplinary, future-oriented, and proactive analyses that yield more effective answers. We close by speculating that marketing can survive in a transhuman and AI-rich environment.

Journal of MacromarketingVol. 44(4)
New Mexico State University (US), Tennessee State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
AI in Service Interactions
2.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Refocusing and Futuring Perspectives on AI in Marketing — Vaidas Lukosius, Michael R. Hyman · Journal of Macromarketing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS