On-Demand and Marketplace Platforms: Gig Care Work Conditions on Two Digital Labour Platform Care Models

With worker shortages and the need for care workers projected to grow, personal care work through digital labour platforms (DLPs) is important to understand. This paper considers DLPs used by gig care workers providing personal care in Ontario, Canada. We recruited 20 women gig care workers for interviews. We examined socio-technical processes such as signing up on platforms, creating profiles, and searching for jobs. We draw on Institutional Ethnography to study the actual work on the following two DLP models: marketplace and on-demand. Marcusean theory provides a lens for the critical examination of DLP care work. We found job inequity between DLPs operating in the homecare sector, compared to DPs used in institutional settings. Jobs had disparate quality between the two platform types. Workers on both DLP types remained vulnerable to fluctuations in demand and had limited social security protections, and both models of DLP institutionalised precarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241279868
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On-Demand and Marketplace Platforms: Gig Care Work Conditions on Two Digital Labour Platform Care Models

Pamela Hopwood, Carrie McAiney, Ellen MacEachen, Basak Yanar et al.
11 citations
Critical Sociology
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
12.45
article

On-Demand and Marketplace Platforms: Gig Care Work Conditions on Two Digital Labour Platform Care Models

Pamela Hopwood, Carrie McAiney, Ellen MacEachen, Basak Yanar, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, Abbey Davis
article en
11 citations

Abstract

With worker shortages and the need for care workers projected to grow, personal care work through digital labour platforms (DLPs) is important to understand. This paper considers DLPs used by gig care workers providing personal care in Ontario, Canada. We recruited 20 women gig care workers for interviews. We examined socio-technical processes such as signing up on platforms, creating profiles, and searching for jobs. We draw on Institutional Ethnography to study the actual work on the following two DLP models: marketplace and on-demand. Marcusean theory provides a lens for the critical examination of DLP care work. We found job inequity between DLPs operating in the homecare sector, compared to DPs used in institutional settings. Jobs had disparate quality between the two platform types. Workers on both DLP types remained vulnerable to fluctuations in demand and had limited social security protections, and both models of DLP institutionalised precarity.

Critical Sociology
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Research Institute for Aging (CA), Institute for Work & Health (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
12.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On-Demand and Marketplace Platforms: Gig Care Work Conditions on Two Digital Labour Platform Care Models — Pamela Hopwood, Carrie McAiney, et al. · Critical Sociology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS