Examining the Impact of Driving Styles of Automated Vehicles and Human Drivers on Driving Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study

As automated vehicles (AVs) progress in driving safely on the road, there is growing concern about the balance and adaptability of their driving styles. This simulator study examines how the driving styles of AVs and human drivers influence drivers’ decisions, behaviors, and trust during interactions in a mixed-traffic environment. In chicken game scenarios, we find that AVs with conservative driving styles are more frequently exploited by drivers, while aggressive drivers are more inclined to exploit AVs. AVs with aggressive driving styles significantly influence driver behavior in lateral interactions. Notably, the conservative driving style of an AV increases drivers’ trust, while the aggressive driving style does not harm it. This indicates that drivers can have a certain degree of confidence in the behavior of AVs with appropriate aggression. Our findings provide insights into how AV design should incorporate scenario-specific adaptive driving styles to balance driver confidence and AV trustworthiness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3641308.3685050
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Impact of Driving Styles of Automated Vehicles and Human Drivers on Driving Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study

Yutong Zhang, Na Du, Danneil Mubbala, B. Ye
2 citations
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
article

Examining the Impact of Driving Styles of Automated Vehicles and Human Drivers on Driving Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study

Yutong Zhang, Na Du, Danneil Mubbala, B. Ye
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As automated vehicles (AVs) progress in driving safely on the road, there is growing concern about the balance and adaptability of their driving styles. This simulator study examines how the driving styles of AVs and human drivers influence drivers’ decisions, behaviors, and trust during interactions in a mixed-traffic environment. In chicken game scenarios, we find that AVs with conservative driving styles are more frequently exploited by drivers, while aggressive drivers are more inclined to exploit AVs. AVs with aggressive driving styles significantly influence driver behavior in lateral interactions. Notably, the conservative driving style of an AV increases drivers’ trust, while the aggressive driving style does not harm it. This indicates that drivers can have a certain degree of confidence in the behavior of AVs with appropriate aggression. Our findings provide insights into how AV design should incorporate scenario-specific adaptive driving styles to balance driver confidence and AV trustworthiness.

University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.