Pesticide regulatory heterogeneity, foreign sourcing, and global agricultural value chains

Abstract Regulations on the production and consumption of goods are very heterogeneous across countries. Whereas the effects of regulations on exports are well known, the responses of importers to heterogeneous and frequently changing country‐specific regulations are not well understood. We combine Swiss firm‐level import customs transaction data with country‐product‐year‐specific maximum residue limits to investigate the effect of pesticide regulatory heterogeneity on firm‐level imports and assess the moderating role of firm size and global value chain participation. Relying on a global sourcing model, we find that regulatory heterogeneity reduces imports but less so in larger and diversified firms. Participating in global value chains also improves firms' flexibility toward heterogeneous regulation. Business diversification—although reducing the gains from trade and scale—could help firms cope with heterogeneous international regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12496
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pesticide regulatory heterogeneity, foreign sourcing, and global agricultural value chains

Bernhard Dalheimer, Gabriele Mack, Dela‐Dem Doe Fiankor
10 citations
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Global trade and economics
8.29
article

Pesticide regulatory heterogeneity, foreign sourcing, and global agricultural value chains

Bernhard Dalheimer, Gabriele Mack, Dela‐Dem Doe Fiankor
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract Regulations on the production and consumption of goods are very heterogeneous across countries. Whereas the effects of regulations on exports are well known, the responses of importers to heterogeneous and frequently changing country‐specific regulations are not well understood. We combine Swiss firm‐level import customs transaction data with country‐product‐year‐specific maximum residue limits to investigate the effect of pesticide regulatory heterogeneity on firm‐level imports and assess the moderating role of firm size and global value chain participation. Relying on a global sourcing model, we find that regulatory heterogeneity reduces imports but less so in larger and diversified firms. Participating in global value chains also improves firms' flexibility toward heterogeneous regulation. Business diversification—although reducing the gains from trade and scale—could help firms cope with heterogeneous international regulations.

American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVol. 107(2)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Agroscope (CH), University of Göttingen (DE)
Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Niedersächsische Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Volkswagen Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Global trade and economics
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.