What Makes Futuristic Vehicles Risky? Preliminary Design Considerations Based on Automation Level and Driving Versus Flying Modes.

When considering novel, futuristic vehicle designs, it is important to consider the technology's “adoption potential”. Literature suggests that perceived risk is one of the key determinants of trust, which in turn affects adoption potential. Our research investigates how risky the general public perceives different design configurations for futuristic urban mobility vehicles, comparing highly futuristic flying cars to more traditional cars, while factoring in the issue of whether the vehicle is operated manually or autonomously. The initial results indicate that there is a combined effect of the level of autonomy and the driving mode of the vehicle on the way people perceive its riskiness. Further, the “exposure” component of perceived risk could be an important driver of people's judgments for future technologies. More research is required to establish the main drivers of futuristic, multimodal vehicles’ risk perception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3641308.3685029
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Makes Futuristic Vehicles Risky? Preliminary Design Considerations Based on Automation Level and Driving Versus Flying Modes.

Bruce N. Walker, Hanna J. Neroj
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

What Makes Futuristic Vehicles Risky? Preliminary Design Considerations Based on Automation Level and Driving Versus Flying Modes.

Bruce N. Walker, Hanna J. Neroj
article en

Abstract

When considering novel, futuristic vehicle designs, it is important to consider the technology's “adoption potential”. Literature suggests that perceived risk is one of the key determinants of trust, which in turn affects adoption potential. Our research investigates how risky the general public perceives different design configurations for futuristic urban mobility vehicles, comparing highly futuristic flying cars to more traditional cars, while factoring in the issue of whether the vehicle is operated manually or autonomously. The initial results indicate that there is a combined effect of the level of autonomy and the driving mode of the vehicle on the way people perceive its riskiness. Further, the “exposure” component of perceived risk could be an important driver of people's judgments for future technologies. More research is required to establish the main drivers of futuristic, multimodal vehicles’ risk perception.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Makes Futuristic Vehicles Risky? Preliminary Design Considerations Based on Automation Level and Driving Versus Flying Modes. — Bruce N. Walker, Hanna J. Neroj · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS