Short Assessment of Voice Assistants Scale (SAVAS): A Screening Instrument for Human-Technology Interaction Assessment

The increasing prevalence of in-vehicle voice assistants (VA) requires efficient evaluation methods. Existing scales provide valuable insights into human-technology interaction. However, their individual application does not provide a holistic impression of VAs, while using all these scales would be time-consuming. Therefore, we present the Short Assessment of Voice Assistants Scale (SAVAS) as a screening instrument, serving as a first step in the evaluation process. Based on a literature review and expert evaluations, we generated an initial item pool and subsequently conducted an online study, involving N = 285 participants evaluating an interaction. An exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors: usability, sociability, transparency, anthropomorphism, and overall visual design with good to excellent reliability values. Our methodological contribution provides a first step towards efficiently investigating users’ attitudes towards VAs. The brief but versatile SAVAS has implications for both industry and academia providing a means to economically assess attitudes on five dimensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3641308.3685031
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short Assessment of Voice Assistants Scale (SAVAS): A Screening Instrument for Human-Technology Interaction Assessment

Anja Strobel, Ann-Christin Hensch, Sarah Mandl, Denise Sogemeier et al.
1 citations
AI in Service Interactions
0.35
article

Short Assessment of Voice Assistants Scale (SAVAS): A Screening Instrument for Human-Technology Interaction Assessment

Anja Strobel, Ann-Christin Hensch, Sarah Mandl, Denise Sogemeier, Yannick Forster
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of in-vehicle voice assistants (VA) requires efficient evaluation methods. Existing scales provide valuable insights into human-technology interaction. However, their individual application does not provide a holistic impression of VAs, while using all these scales would be time-consuming. Therefore, we present the Short Assessment of Voice Assistants Scale (SAVAS) as a screening instrument, serving as a first step in the evaluation process. Based on a literature review and expert evaluations, we generated an initial item pool and subsequently conducted an online study, involving N = 285 participants evaluating an interaction. An exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors: usability, sociability, transparency, anthropomorphism, and overall visual design with good to excellent reliability values. Our methodological contribution provides a first step towards efficiently investigating users’ attitudes towards VAs. The brief but versatile SAVAS has implications for both industry and academia providing a means to economically assess attitudes on five dimensions.

Chemnitz University of Technology (DE), BMW Group (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
AI in Service Interactions
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.