Construction minerals as part of an urban circular economy? A multi-scalar study of the city of Oslo and its hinterland

Abstract Flows of construction minerals in the Oslo region are studied in a multi-scalar perspective. Urban densification and construction of infrastructure result in large volumes of gravel and stone which according to law is waste. Waste is landfilled in the hinterland putting pressure on socio-ecological qualities. Lack of regional planning promoting circularity implies municipalities in the hinterland have to regulate land for landfills. Norway has a competitive advantage in construction minerals and prices on virgin, compared to recycled construction minerals are relatively low. Combined with a planning regime supporting linear resource governance, the consumption of virgin construction minerals and farmland in the hinterland is de facto stimulated. Differences are identified between the Oslo region and some city regions in the core of Europe concerning the level of progress towards a circular economy. A distinction between resource-rich and resource-strapped regions is proposed as part of an explanation of such differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsae030
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction minerals as part of an urban circular economy? A multi-scalar study of the city of Oslo and its hinterland

Bjørnar Sæther
2 citations
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society
Mining and Resource Management
0.53
article

Construction minerals as part of an urban circular economy? A multi-scalar study of the city of Oslo and its hinterland

Bjørnar Sæther
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Flows of construction minerals in the Oslo region are studied in a multi-scalar perspective. Urban densification and construction of infrastructure result in large volumes of gravel and stone which according to law is waste. Waste is landfilled in the hinterland putting pressure on socio-ecological qualities. Lack of regional planning promoting circularity implies municipalities in the hinterland have to regulate land for landfills. Norway has a competitive advantage in construction minerals and prices on virgin, compared to recycled construction minerals are relatively low. Combined with a planning regime supporting linear resource governance, the consumption of virgin construction minerals and farmland in the hinterland is de facto stimulated. Differences are identified between the Oslo region and some city regions in the core of Europe concerning the level of progress towards a circular economy. A distinction between resource-rich and resource-strapped regions is proposed as part of an explanation of such differences.

Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and SocietyVol. 17(3)
University of Oslo (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Mining and Resource Management
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Construction minerals as part of an urban circular economy? A multi-scalar study of the city of Oslo and its hinterland — Bjørnar Sæther · Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS