One Step Forward, How Many Steps Back? Benchmarking the US Covid-19 Pandemic Response Against United Nations Sustainable Development Target 3.3

In 2015, the United Nations adopted 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs), mapping out specific targets to work toward in order to achieve worldwide peace and prosperity. SDG 3 promotes healthy living, while target 3.3 strives to end epidemics of various infectious diseases. In this project, I examine how the Covid-19 outbreak impacted the US’s progress toward SDG target 3.3, analyzing both academic literature and government documents in the form of a literature review. I discuss trends and flaws in the US pandemic response, briefly contrasting US containment measures with Singapore’s, before examining the pandemic’s effects on incidence rates and service outcomes for two communicable diseases — tuberculosis and HIV. Although a lack of internal and external coordination, the federalist structure of the US government, inflexible funding, and politicization of infectious disease control prevented the CDC from responding to the pandemic effectively, tuberculosis incidence rates dropped in 2020 due to less face-to-face contact and possible missed diagnoses, while HIV services experienced a rebound in late 2020 due to self test, telehealth, and antiretroviral therapy home delivery services. While Covid-19 did not dismantle the US’s progress toward UN SDG target 3.3, greater communication, deeper public understanding, and an ability to expect the unexpected would accelerate the US’s movement toward effective management of communicable diseases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarly review .
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70121/001c.123716
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Step Forward, How Many Steps Back? Benchmarking the US Covid-19 Pandemic Response Against United Nations Sustainable Development Target 3.3

Yongfan Li
Scholarly review .
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
article

One Step Forward, How Many Steps Back? Benchmarking the US Covid-19 Pandemic Response Against United Nations Sustainable Development Target 3.3

Yongfan Li
article en

Abstract

In 2015, the United Nations adopted 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs), mapping out specific targets to work toward in order to achieve worldwide peace and prosperity. SDG 3 promotes healthy living, while target 3.3 strives to end epidemics of various infectious diseases. In this project, I examine how the Covid-19 outbreak impacted the US’s progress toward SDG target 3.3, analyzing both academic literature and government documents in the form of a literature review. I discuss trends and flaws in the US pandemic response, briefly contrasting US containment measures with Singapore’s, before examining the pandemic’s effects on incidence rates and service outcomes for two communicable diseases — tuberculosis and HIV. Although a lack of internal and external coordination, the federalist structure of the US government, inflexible funding, and politicization of infectious disease control prevented the CDC from responding to the pandemic effectively, tuberculosis incidence rates dropped in 2020 due to less face-to-face contact and possible missed diagnoses, while HIV services experienced a rebound in late 2020 due to self test, telehealth, and antiretroviral therapy home delivery services. While Covid-19 did not dismantle the US’s progress toward UN SDG target 3.3, greater communication, deeper public understanding, and an ability to expect the unexpected would accelerate the US’s movement toward effective management of communicable diseases.

Scholarly review .Vol. Fall 2024(10)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.