Using Social Media to Respond to Negative Polls: Politicians’ Issue Responsiveness on Facebook

Social media has changed the link between politicians and voters. An unsettled question is how politicians use social media in the political agenda-setting competition. Do they respond to issue priorities of the public, or do they try to lead voter priorities as covered in the mass media? We argue that politicians’ behavior depends on their reelection prospects. If politicians receive information that their electoral prospects have worsened, they act as agenda takers, paying more attention to the issues that voters are perceived to care about. We test our argument based on 27,421 Facebook posts by 146 Danish national Members of Parliament, monthly public polls of citizens’ voting intentions, and mass media issue agendas in one nonelection year. We find that bad polls substantially increase politicians’ focus on top media issues, indicating that social media provides losing politicians with a flexible and low-cost platform for on-going short-term political responsiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733007
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Social Media to Respond to Negative Polls: Politicians’ Issue Responsiveness on Facebook

Henrik Bech Seeberg, Helene Helboe Pedersen
2 citations
The Journal of Politics
Social Media and Politics
1.91
article

Using Social Media to Respond to Negative Polls: Politicians’ Issue Responsiveness on Facebook

Henrik Bech Seeberg, Helene Helboe Pedersen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Social media has changed the link between politicians and voters. An unsettled question is how politicians use social media in the political agenda-setting competition. Do they respond to issue priorities of the public, or do they try to lead voter priorities as covered in the mass media? We argue that politicians’ behavior depends on their reelection prospects. If politicians receive information that their electoral prospects have worsened, they act as agenda takers, paying more attention to the issues that voters are perceived to care about. We test our argument based on 27,421 Facebook posts by 146 Danish national Members of Parliament, monthly public polls of citizens’ voting intentions, and mass media issue agendas in one nonelection year. We find that bad polls substantially increase politicians’ focus on top media issues, indicating that social media provides losing politicians with a flexible and low-cost platform for on-going short-term political responsiveness.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(3)
Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Social Media and Politics
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using Social Media to Respond to Negative Polls: Politicians’ Issue Responsiveness on Facebook — Henrik Bech Seeberg, Helene Helboe Pedersen · The Journal of Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS