A Double Negative: Capitalizing on Assessment Regressivity

We estimate the degree to which tax inequity generated through property tax assessment practices are capitalized into residential property values. Our analysis not only evaluates whether property buyers understand the tax obligations they are likely to face at the purchase of their property, we also document varying effects based on assessment status. Overassessed, lower-valued property sell for a discount and underassessed, higher-valued property sell for a premium. Specifically, overassessed property sells for an undercapitalized discount of 13%, while underassessed property sells for overcapitalized premiums equal more than 10%. Together, our results imply assessment practices impact wealth both during and after property ownership, potentially widening the wealth gap between high- and low-income homeowners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Finance Review
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421241280456
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Double Negative: Capitalizing on Assessment Regressivity

Timothy M. Komarek, Timothy R. Hodge, Andrew McAllister
Public Finance Review
Housing Market and Economics
article

A Double Negative: Capitalizing on Assessment Regressivity

Timothy M. Komarek, Timothy R. Hodge, Andrew McAllister
article en

Abstract

We estimate the degree to which tax inequity generated through property tax assessment practices are capitalized into residential property values. Our analysis not only evaluates whether property buyers understand the tax obligations they are likely to face at the purchase of their property, we also document varying effects based on assessment status. Overassessed, lower-valued property sell for a discount and underassessed, higher-valued property sell for a premium. Specifically, overassessed property sells for an undercapitalized discount of 13%, while underassessed property sells for overcapitalized premiums equal more than 10%. Together, our results imply assessment practices impact wealth both during and after property ownership, potentially widening the wealth gap between high- and low-income homeowners.

Public Finance ReviewVol. 53(6)
Oakland University (US), Colorado State University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Double Negative: Capitalizing on Assessment Regressivity — Timothy M. Komarek, Timothy R. Hodge, et al. · Public Finance Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS