Recommended practice for measurement and evaluation of oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis

Abstract The Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is a pivotal technology driving next‐generation sustainable energy conversion and storage devices. Establishing a robust analytical methodology is paramount to fostering innovation in this field. This review offers a comprehensive discussion on measurement and interpretation, advocating for standardized protocols and best practices to mitigate the myriad factors that complicate analysis. The initial focus is directed toward substrate electrodes and gas bubbles, both significant contributors to reduced reliability and reproducibility. Subsequently, the review focuses on intrinsic activity assessment, identification of electrochemical active sites, and the disentanglement of competing process contributions. These careful methodologies ensure the systematic delivery of insights crucial for assessing OER performance. In conclusion, the review highlights the critical role played by precise measurement techniques and unbiased activity comparison methodologies in propelling advancements in OER catalyst development. image

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EcoMat
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.12486
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommended practice for measurement and evaluation of oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis

Dong Young Chung, Hongmin An, Heejong Shin, Wonchul Park
18 citations
EcoMat
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
1.84
article

Recommended practice for measurement and evaluation of oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis

Dong Young Chung, Hongmin An, Heejong Shin, Wonchul Park
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is a pivotal technology driving next‐generation sustainable energy conversion and storage devices. Establishing a robust analytical methodology is paramount to fostering innovation in this field. This review offers a comprehensive discussion on measurement and interpretation, advocating for standardized protocols and best practices to mitigate the myriad factors that complicate analysis. The initial focus is directed toward substrate electrodes and gas bubbles, both significant contributors to reduced reliability and reproducibility. Subsequently, the review focuses on intrinsic activity assessment, identification of electrochemical active sites, and the disentanglement of competing process contributions. These careful methodologies ensure the systematic delivery of insights crucial for assessing OER performance. In conclusion, the review highlights the critical role played by precise measurement techniques and unbiased activity comparison methodologies in propelling advancements in OER catalyst development. image

EcoMatVol. 6(10)
Northwestern University (US), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.