Business, Conflict, and Peace: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework

Abstract There is growing recognition that business activity can promote peacebuilding, yet contradictory claims have emerged about company roles in peace and conflict. The research field of business and peace has focused on this issue, as have scholars in related fields like political science, economics, law, and ethics. This has led to definitional variations, alongside unit and level of analysis differences, which generate contradictory claims that hamper future research on this critical topic. To reconcile extant research around companies and their place in peacebuilding scholarship, we undertake an organizational‐level examination of the field, cataloguing the research by scholars across disciplines through a systematic review of 215 publications. Our review maps the known ways by which businesses can engage in peacebuilding, while demonstrating how organizations exercise their agency to create heterogenous effects on peace and conflict. Our analysis highlights the need for businesses to advance peace‐positive ends across a range of activities to reduce the conflict‐causing effects of business. By showing that businesses, intentionally or not, create peace or conflict through their activities, this article issues a call to action for scholars and decision‐makers to advance knowledge concerning peacebuilding organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Studies
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13139
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Flannery O'Connor and Thomas Merton
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Business, Conflict, and Peace: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework

Jay Joseph, Adam Lindgreen, François Maon, John E. Katsos et al.
9 citations
Journal of Management Studies
Flannery O'Connor and Thomas Merton
6.07
article

Business, Conflict, and Peace: A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework

Jay Joseph, Adam Lindgreen, François Maon, John E. Katsos, Maria Teresa Uribe‐Jaramillo
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is growing recognition that business activity can promote peacebuilding, yet contradictory claims have emerged about company roles in peace and conflict. The research field of business and peace has focused on this issue, as have scholars in related fields like political science, economics, law, and ethics. This has led to definitional variations, alongside unit and level of analysis differences, which generate contradictory claims that hamper future research on this critical topic. To reconcile extant research around companies and their place in peacebuilding scholarship, we undertake an organizational‐level examination of the field, cataloguing the research by scholars across disciplines through a systematic review of 215 publications. Our review maps the known ways by which businesses can engage in peacebuilding, while demonstrating how organizations exercise their agency to create heterogenous effects on peace and conflict. Our analysis highlights the need for businesses to advance peace‐positive ends across a range of activities to reduce the conflict‐causing effects of business. By showing that businesses, intentionally or not, create peace or conflict through their activities, this article issues a call to action for scholars and decision‐makers to advance knowledge concerning peacebuilding organizations.

Journal of Management StudiesVol. 62(4)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Copenhagen Business School (DK), American University of Sharjah (AE), Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion (FR), Lille Économie Management (FR), Kedge Business School (FR), University of Pretoria (ZA), American University of Beirut (LB)
American University of Beirut
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Flannery O'Connor and Thomas Merton
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.