Gender Stereotypes in Autocracies: Experimental Evidence from Morocco

How do gender stereotypes shape voters’ evaluations of female politicians in autocracies? Despite increased women’s representation in autocracies, we know less about the link between gender stereotypes and voters’ assessment of female politicians in these contexts because findings on political gender stereotypes are mostly drawn from established democracies. This registered report draws on a nationally representative survey with an embedded conjoint experiment to examine how voters evaluate female politicians’ competency in a conservative electoral autocracy: Morocco. We argue that stereotypes would lead voters to generally view female politicians as less competent but that competency ratings would improve when women were described as assertive or ambitious, focused on priority issue areas, highly productive, or effective at clientelistic service provision. We find weak evidence that respondents evaluate male politicians more favorably and no evidence that gender stereotypes play a central role in shaping voters’ evaluations of either male or female politicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733000
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Stereotypes in Autocracies: Experimental Evidence from Morocco

Marwa Shalaby, Carolyn L. Barnett, Alexandra Domike Blackman
5 citations
The Journal of Politics
Gender Politics and Representation
4.65
article

Gender Stereotypes in Autocracies: Experimental Evidence from Morocco

Marwa Shalaby, Carolyn L. Barnett, Alexandra Domike Blackman
article en
5 citations

Abstract

How do gender stereotypes shape voters’ evaluations of female politicians in autocracies? Despite increased women’s representation in autocracies, we know less about the link between gender stereotypes and voters’ assessment of female politicians in these contexts because findings on political gender stereotypes are mostly drawn from established democracies. This registered report draws on a nationally representative survey with an embedded conjoint experiment to examine how voters evaluate female politicians’ competency in a conservative electoral autocracy: Morocco. We argue that stereotypes would lead voters to generally view female politicians as less competent but that competency ratings would improve when women were described as assertive or ambitious, focused on priority issue areas, highly productive, or effective at clientelistic service provision. We find weak evidence that respondents evaluate male politicians more favorably and no evidence that gender stereotypes play a central role in shaping voters’ evaluations of either male or female politicians.

The Journal of PoliticsVol. 87(3)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Arizona (US), Cornell University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Politics and Representation
4.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender Stereotypes in Autocracies: Experimental Evidence from Morocco — Marwa Shalaby, Carolyn L. Barnett, et al. · The Journal of Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS