STAD atau Jigsaw? Menguji Keefektifan Dua Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dalam PKn

This study aims to determine the differences in Civic Education learning outcomes between students taught using the STAD cooperative learning model and the Jigsaw cooperative learning model at MAN 1 Kendari. The research method used is an experimental design with a post-test only control group design. The sample consists of 60 students, selected through multi-stage random sampling, with 30 students from class XI IPS2 and 30 students from class XI IPS3. Data were collected using a Civic Education learning outcomes test, which was validated and tested for reliability, with a reliability score of 0.903. The results showed that the average learning outcomes of students taught with the STAD model were higher (87.21) compared to those taught with the Jigsaw model (73.44). Hypothesis testing revealed a significant difference between the two learning models, with a t-value (30) greater than the t-table value (2.390) at a 0.01 significance level. This study concludes that the STAD cooperative learning model is more effective in improving Civic Education learning outcomes compared to the Jigsaw learning model.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51454/jimsh.v6i2.775
Primary Topic
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STAD atau Jigsaw? Menguji Keefektifan Dua Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dalam PKn

Bahartiar Bahartiar
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
article

STAD atau Jigsaw? Menguji Keefektifan Dua Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dalam PKn

Bahartiar Bahartiar
article en

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in Civic Education learning outcomes between students taught using the STAD cooperative learning model and the Jigsaw cooperative learning model at MAN 1 Kendari. The research method used is an experimental design with a post-test only control group design. The sample consists of 60 students, selected through multi-stage random sampling, with 30 students from class XI IPS2 and 30 students from class XI IPS3. Data were collected using a Civic Education learning outcomes test, which was validated and tested for reliability, with a reliability score of 0.903. The results showed that the average learning outcomes of students taught with the STAD model were higher (87.21) compared to those taught with the Jigsaw model (73.44). Hypothesis testing revealed a significant difference between the two learning models, with a t-value (30) greater than the t-table value (2.390) at a 0.01 significance level. This study concludes that the STAD cooperative learning model is more effective in improving Civic Education learning outcomes compared to the Jigsaw learning model.

Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH)Vol. 6(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

STAD atau Jigsaw? Menguji Keefektifan Dua Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dalam PKn — Bahartiar Bahartiar · Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS