Selective insensitivity to income held by the richest

The misperception of income inequality is often touted as a critical barrier to more widespread support of redistributive policies. Here, we examine to what extent and why (mis)perceptions vary systematically across the income distribution. Drawing on data from four studies (<i>N</i> = 2,744)-including a representative sample and preregistered incentive-compatible experiments-we offer converging evidence that people specifically underestimate the amount of income held by the top of the income distribution. While this selective underestimation is likely driven by multiple mechanisms, including systemic factors, we find that cognitive biases contribute to the observed pattern of results. The rise of inequality in many developed countries has been documented before, and the fact that this growing inequality is largely driven by the outsized gains of the richest individuals may pose new challenges previously underappreciated: our theory and findings highlight that cognitive biases pose a key obstacle to people's recognition of the concentration of income among the richest individuals, and may potentially distort their preferences for redistribution. We conclude by discussing future directions for research and the importance of incorporating behavioral and cognitive limitations into the design of redistributive public policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae333
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selective insensitivity to income held by the richest

Oliver Hauser, Barnabás Szászi, Hooman Habibnia, Jon Jachimowicz et al.
5 citations
PNAS Nexus
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
5.66
article

Selective insensitivity to income held by the richest

Oliver Hauser, Barnabás Szászi, Hooman Habibnia, Jon Jachimowicz, Josephine Tan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The misperception of income inequality is often touted as a critical barrier to more widespread support of redistributive policies. Here, we examine to what extent and why (mis)perceptions vary systematically across the income distribution. Drawing on data from four studies (<i>N</i> = 2,744)-including a representative sample and preregistered incentive-compatible experiments-we offer converging evidence that people specifically underestimate the amount of income held by the top of the income distribution. While this selective underestimation is likely driven by multiple mechanisms, including systemic factors, we find that cognitive biases contribute to the observed pattern of results. The rise of inequality in many developed countries has been documented before, and the fact that this growing inequality is largely driven by the outsized gains of the richest individuals may pose new challenges previously underappreciated: our theory and findings highlight that cognitive biases pose a key obstacle to people's recognition of the concentration of income among the richest individuals, and may potentially distort their preferences for redistribution. We conclude by discussing future directions for research and the importance of incorporating behavioral and cognitive limitations into the design of redistributive public policy.

PNAS NexusVol. 3(9)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Harvard University (US), University of Exeter (GB), Stanford University (US)
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Selective insensitivity to income held by the richest — Oliver Hauser, Barnabás Szászi, et al. · PNAS Nexus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS