National politics ignites more talk of morality and power than local politics

Politics and the media in the United States are increasingly nationalized, and this changes how we talk about politics. Instead of reading the local news and discussing local events, people are more often consuming national media and discussing national issues. Unlike local politics, which can rely on shared concrete knowledge about the region, national politics must coordinate large groups of people with little in common. To provide this coordination, we find that national-level political discussions rely upon different themes than local-level discussions, using more abstract, moralized, and power-centric language. The higher prevalence of abstract, moralized, and power-centric language in national vs. local politics was found in political speeches, politician Tweets, and Reddit discussions. These national-level linguistic features lead to broader engagement with political messages, but they also foster more anger and negativity. These findings suggest that the nationalization of politics and the media may contribute to rising partisan animosity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae345
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National politics ignites more talk of morality and power than local politics

Longjiao Li, Kurt Gray, Curtis Puryear, Andre Chiquito et al.
PNAS Nexus
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

National politics ignites more talk of morality and power than local politics

Longjiao Li, Kurt Gray, Curtis Puryear, Andre Chiquito, Danica Dillion
article en

Abstract

Politics and the media in the United States are increasingly nationalized, and this changes how we talk about politics. Instead of reading the local news and discussing local events, people are more often consuming national media and discussing national issues. Unlike local politics, which can rely on shared concrete knowledge about the region, national politics must coordinate large groups of people with little in common. To provide this coordination, we find that national-level political discussions rely upon different themes than local-level discussions, using more abstract, moralized, and power-centric language. The higher prevalence of abstract, moralized, and power-centric language in national vs. local politics was found in political speeches, politician Tweets, and Reddit discussions. These national-level linguistic features lead to broader engagement with political messages, but they also foster more anger and negativity. These findings suggest that the nationalization of politics and the media may contribute to rising partisan animosity.

PNAS NexusVol. 3(9)
Northwestern University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Templeton World Charity Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

National politics ignites more talk of morality and power than local politics — Longjiao Li, Kurt Gray, et al. · PNAS Nexus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS