Effects of two types of distractions on ratings of perceived exertion and affective response during acute high-intensity cycling exercise for fair cardiorespiratory fitness level in men

This study examined the effects of distractions on ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and affective responses during acute high intensity cycling exercises. Eighteen young males (age: 22.2 ± 1.7 years) visited the laboratory on four sessions. Participants performed three experimental trials following an incremental maximal test. During the three trials, participants performed cycling exercises at 70% VO2max for 20 min under three conditions: control, active distraction, and involuntary distraction. The participants rated their overall and peripheral RPE at 5-min intervals during the 20-min cycling period. Participants’ affective responses were assessed before and after cycling including positive engagement (PE), negative affect (N-affect), and tranquility. There were no significant differences in RPEs among the three conditions. For affective responses, a significant main effect of condition was seen only for N-affect. This study suggested that active and involuntary distractions do not influence perceived exertion when participants perform 20-min vigorous-intensity exercises. One possible reason for the result is that an inadequate method was used as the active distraction. Further research is required to examine the appropriate methods that promote distraction from bodily sensations during high-intensity exercise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7600/jpfsm.13.145
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of two types of distractions on ratings of perceived exertion and affective response during acute high-intensity cycling exercise for fair cardiorespiratory fitness level in men

Yoichi Hayashi, Shun Wakatabe
The Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effects of two types of distractions on ratings of perceived exertion and affective response during acute high-intensity cycling exercise for fair cardiorespiratory fitness level in men

Yoichi Hayashi, Shun Wakatabe
article en

Abstract

This study examined the effects of distractions on ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and affective responses during acute high intensity cycling exercises. Eighteen young males (age: 22.2 ± 1.7 years) visited the laboratory on four sessions. Participants performed three experimental trials following an incremental maximal test. During the three trials, participants performed cycling exercises at 70% VO2max for 20 min under three conditions: control, active distraction, and involuntary distraction. The participants rated their overall and peripheral RPE at 5-min intervals during the 20-min cycling period. Participants’ affective responses were assessed before and after cycling including positive engagement (PE), negative affect (N-affect), and tranquility. There were no significant differences in RPEs among the three conditions. For affective responses, a significant main effect of condition was seen only for N-affect. This study suggested that active and involuntary distractions do not influence perceived exertion when participants perform 20-min vigorous-intensity exercises. One possible reason for the result is that an inadequate method was used as the active distraction. Further research is required to examine the appropriate methods that promote distraction from bodily sensations during high-intensity exercise.

The Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports MedicineVol. 13(5)
Hosei University (JP)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.