Structural optimization design and compression performance of porous titanium prepared by laser powder bed fusion

Porous implants composed of periodically-repeating porous units have been applied in orthopedic surgeries to replace damaged bones. An important requirement for bone implants is to find a balance between biological and mechanical properties, that is, to ensure high pore connectivity and a certain strength. In this work, center-supported and perimeter-supported porous optimization models were established by a swarm intelligence optimization algorithm, and the corresponding titanium porous samples were fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF). The effects of cell topology and porosity on the compressive behavior of L-PBF titanium porous structures were systematically investigated by a combination of compression simulation and experiments. Compression simulation shows that the deformation failure behavior of center-supported and perimeter-supported porous structures consists of three stages: elastic deformation, plastic deformation and compression collapse, showing the characteristics of elastic-plastic porous materials. According to the compression test results, the compressive strength of center-supported and perimeter-supported structure samples are 151–188 MPa and 178–196 MPa, respectively, and the compressive stability of the perimeter-supported structure is better than that of the center-supported structure. The porosity error of center-supported structure is 1.6%–2.9%, and the porosity error of perimeter-supported structure is 3.1%–4.5%. The compressive strength of the same type of structure decreases with the increase of the porosity of the porous structure. The simulation/experimental compressive strength errors of center-supported and perimeter-supported structures are less than 6% and 5.9%, respectively. The constructed quasi-static compression model has certain guiding significance for the study of the fracture of the titanium implants under external force.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.09.116
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural optimization design and compression performance of porous titanium prepared by laser powder bed fusion

Jianbo Lei, Yabao Hu, Zhixue Wang, Hongchuan Li et al.
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Structural optimization design and compression performance of porous titanium prepared by laser powder bed fusion

Jianbo Lei, Yabao Hu, Zhixue Wang, Hongchuan Li, Hanning Chen, Songpeng Zhang
article en

Abstract

Porous implants composed of periodically-repeating porous units have been applied in orthopedic surgeries to replace damaged bones. An important requirement for bone implants is to find a balance between biological and mechanical properties, that is, to ensure high pore connectivity and a certain strength. In this work, center-supported and perimeter-supported porous optimization models were established by a swarm intelligence optimization algorithm, and the corresponding titanium porous samples were fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF). The effects of cell topology and porosity on the compressive behavior of L-PBF titanium porous structures were systematically investigated by a combination of compression simulation and experiments. Compression simulation shows that the deformation failure behavior of center-supported and perimeter-supported porous structures consists of three stages: elastic deformation, plastic deformation and compression collapse, showing the characteristics of elastic-plastic porous materials. According to the compression test results, the compressive strength of center-supported and perimeter-supported structure samples are 151–188 MPa and 178–196 MPa, respectively, and the compressive stability of the perimeter-supported structure is better than that of the center-supported structure. The porosity error of center-supported structure is 1.6%–2.9%, and the porosity error of perimeter-supported structure is 3.1%–4.5%. The compressive strength of the same type of structure decreases with the increase of the porosity of the porous structure. The simulation/experimental compressive strength errors of center-supported and perimeter-supported structures are less than 6% and 5.9%, respectively. The constructed quasi-static compression model has certain guiding significance for the study of the fracture of the titanium implants under external force.

Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyVol. 33
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Tianjin University of Science and Technology (CN), Tiangong University (CN), Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.