Global pandemic governance: A multilevel concept for managing pandemic crises worldwide
This article examines how countries can effectively respond to global health pandemics in six stages. Previous research has assumed that human social and economic activities affect the spread of viral infectious diseases, and it has been noted that countries fight global pandemics independently, making the response inefficient. As no comprehensive governing guidelines exist for managing global public health pandemics, this article argues for the need for an international, integrated governance framework, offering theoretical reflections on a novel integrated, multilevel governance concept, the Global Governance of Pandemic Crises (GGPC), which is centered around crisis management theory at an international level. The article differentiates four pandemic governance processes—risk, emergence, recovery, and goal governance—in six pandemic periods that are linked to different processes of public health pandemic governance. The GGPC concept may prove useful to organisations responsible for governing pandemics and implementing relevant measures in affected countries. • Responding to global health pandemics in six stages. • Advocates the need for international, integrated governance framework. • Global Governance of Pandemic Crises centered on crisis management theory. • Useful to organisations implementing pandemic control measures in affected areas.
Authors
- Jia Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-6617)
- Dai Wei-dong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0943-6797)
- Birgit Pfau‐Effinger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-8397)
- Zhang Guo-hu
Institutions
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
- Anhui Normal University (CN)
- Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Published
- 2024-09-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104829
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Disaster Management and Resilience
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.53