Global pandemic governance: A multilevel concept for managing pandemic crises worldwide

This article examines how countries can effectively respond to global health pandemics in six stages. Previous research has assumed that human social and economic activities affect the spread of viral infectious diseases, and it has been noted that countries fight global pandemics independently, making the response inefficient. As no comprehensive governing guidelines exist for managing global public health pandemics, this article argues for the need for an international, integrated governance framework, offering theoretical reflections on a novel integrated, multilevel governance concept, the Global Governance of Pandemic Crises (GGPC), which is centered around crisis management theory at an international level. The article differentiates four pandemic governance processes—risk, emergence, recovery, and goal governance—in six pandemic periods that are linked to different processes of public health pandemic governance. The GGPC concept may prove useful to organisations responsible for governing pandemics and implementing relevant measures in affected countries. • Responding to global health pandemics in six stages. • Advocates the need for international, integrated governance framework. • Global Governance of Pandemic Crises centered on crisis management theory. • Useful to organisations implementing pandemic control measures in affected areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104829
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global pandemic governance: A multilevel concept for managing pandemic crises worldwide

Jia Xu, Dai Wei-dong, Birgit Pfau‐Effinger, Zhang Guo-hu
4 citations
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.53
article

Global pandemic governance: A multilevel concept for managing pandemic crises worldwide

Jia Xu, Dai Wei-dong, Birgit Pfau‐Effinger, Zhang Guo-hu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This article examines how countries can effectively respond to global health pandemics in six stages. Previous research has assumed that human social and economic activities affect the spread of viral infectious diseases, and it has been noted that countries fight global pandemics independently, making the response inefficient. As no comprehensive governing guidelines exist for managing global public health pandemics, this article argues for the need for an international, integrated governance framework, offering theoretical reflections on a novel integrated, multilevel governance concept, the Global Governance of Pandemic Crises (GGPC), which is centered around crisis management theory at an international level. The article differentiates four pandemic governance processes—risk, emergence, recovery, and goal governance—in six pandemic periods that are linked to different processes of public health pandemic governance. The GGPC concept may prove useful to organisations responsible for governing pandemics and implementing relevant measures in affected countries. • Responding to global health pandemics in six stages. • Advocates the need for international, integrated governance framework. • Global Governance of Pandemic Crises centered on crisis management theory. • Useful to organisations implementing pandemic control measures in affected areas.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 113
Universität Hamburg (DE), Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Anhui Normal University (CN), Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.