Optimizing Emergency Logistics Identification: Utilizing A Deep Learning Model in the Big Data Era

This study investigates the dynamics of commodity flow across different facilities and settings, evaluating the performance of Simulation and Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN) methods in optimizing these flows. Analyzing data from various configurations, the research reveals significant variations in commodity distribution patterns. At Facility_1 from the K1 disposer market, the flow of Commodity_1 increased from 770 units to 830 units, while Commodity_2 decreased from 192 units to 166 units. At Facility_2, Commodity_1's flow decreased from 851 units to 793 units, and Commodity_2's flow slightly increased from 139 units to 148 units. Similar trends are observed at facilities from the K2 disposer market, reflecting the complex impact of different settings on commodity flow. The comparative analysis of Simulation and FFNN methods demonstrates their relative strengths. In Setting I, the Simulation method achieved an objective value of 1,800,574.36 Rs with a computation time of 46.78 seconds, while the FFNN method yielded a slightly lower objective value of 1,800,352.24 Rs in 42.01 seconds. In Setting II, the Simulation method provided an objective value of 1,801,025.36 Rs with a computation time of 103.86 seconds, whereas FFNN achieved a comparable objective value of 1,800,847.27 Rs in 63.05 seconds. In Setting III, Simulation resulted in an objective value of 1,801,527.36 Rs with a computation time of 61.12 seconds, while FFNN produced a higher objective value of 1,806,997.32 Rs in 50.03 seconds. The results highlight the trade-offs between solution quality and computational efficiency. The Simulation method consistently delivers higher objective values but requires more time, making it suitable for applications where result accuracy is crucial. Conversely, the FFNN method offers faster computation with competitive or superior objective values, making it advantageous for scenarios where time constraints are significant. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate computational methods based on specific operational needs, optimizing both the efficiency and effectiveness of commodity flow management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Data Sciences
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v5i3.369
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Emergency Logistics Identification: Utilizing A Deep Learning Model in the Big Data Era

Siti Sarah Maidin
6 citations
Journal of Applied Data Sciences
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.08
article

Optimizing Emergency Logistics Identification: Utilizing A Deep Learning Model in the Big Data Era

Siti Sarah Maidin
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamics of commodity flow across different facilities and settings, evaluating the performance of Simulation and Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN) methods in optimizing these flows. Analyzing data from various configurations, the research reveals significant variations in commodity distribution patterns. At Facility_1 from the K1 disposer market, the flow of Commodity_1 increased from 770 units to 830 units, while Commodity_2 decreased from 192 units to 166 units. At Facility_2, Commodity_1's flow decreased from 851 units to 793 units, and Commodity_2's flow slightly increased from 139 units to 148 units. Similar trends are observed at facilities from the K2 disposer market, reflecting the complex impact of different settings on commodity flow. The comparative analysis of Simulation and FFNN methods demonstrates their relative strengths. In Setting I, the Simulation method achieved an objective value of 1,800,574.36 Rs with a computation time of 46.78 seconds, while the FFNN method yielded a slightly lower objective value of 1,800,352.24 Rs in 42.01 seconds. In Setting II, the Simulation method provided an objective value of 1,801,025.36 Rs with a computation time of 103.86 seconds, whereas FFNN achieved a comparable objective value of 1,800,847.27 Rs in 63.05 seconds. In Setting III, Simulation resulted in an objective value of 1,801,527.36 Rs with a computation time of 61.12 seconds, while FFNN produced a higher objective value of 1,806,997.32 Rs in 50.03 seconds. The results highlight the trade-offs between solution quality and computational efficiency. The Simulation method consistently delivers higher objective values but requires more time, making it suitable for applications where result accuracy is crucial. Conversely, the FFNN method offers faster computation with competitive or superior objective values, making it advantageous for scenarios where time constraints are significant. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate computational methods based on specific operational needs, optimizing both the efficiency and effectiveness of commodity flow management.

Journal of Applied Data SciencesVol. 5(3)
INTI International University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.