Analysis of in-bin low-temperature and high-temperature grain drying in Alberta: Specific energy, carbon costs and policy implications

Optimizing grain drying process is pivotal for both economic viability and environmental sustainability. In cold countries, supplemental heating is paramount but instigates the issue of carbon release at the same time. To curve the emission, a carbon levy has been imposed that varies with fuel types. However, there is limited knowledge of the impact of field-adaptable technologies utilizing commercialized fuels on the optimal execution of grain drying. To explore this, a comprehensive three-year on-farm grain drying study was conducted in the province of Alberta, Canada. This comparative analysis centered on three critical aspects, i.e., specific energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), and operating costs. Furthermore, the research extended its projections into the year 2030, accounting for the impact of gradual carbon levies on natural gas, propane, and diesel fuel systems. showed that indirect heaters in in-bin systems were 38 % more energy-efficient than direct heaters due to better airflow and higher initial grain temperatures, while indirect heaters with diesel burners exhibited 27.8 % lower burner turndown ratios and 35.4 % higher energy consumption than natural gas counterparts. In high-temperature drying, natural gas consumption decreased as supply air temperatures rose, with double-flow dryer showing the lowest energy consumption (6.3±1.9 GJ/t) in comparison to mixed-flow and cross-flow dryer due to waste heat recovery. Heaters and Dryers operated at varying load capacities, indicated 126–135 % increase in natural gas cost with carbon levy by 2030. Achieving lower specific energy consumption in grain drying requires precise burner and process control, along with maintenance, offering valuable guidance for producers. • Indirect heaters were 38 % efficient than direct heaters in this study. • Diesel fuel in indirect heaters was 35.4 % less efficient than natural gas. • Natural gas will see 126–135 % increment in drying cost by 2030. • Grain drying rate could be higher or lower than fuel consumption rate. • Adjusting burner load is crucial for lowest energy consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.013
Primary Topic
Food Drying and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of in-bin low-temperature and high-temperature grain drying in Alberta: Specific energy, carbon costs and policy implications

C. B. Singh, Shubham Subrot Panigrahi, Lorne Grieger
Energy Reports
Food Drying and Modeling
article

Analysis of in-bin low-temperature and high-temperature grain drying in Alberta: Specific energy, carbon costs and policy implications

C. B. Singh, Shubham Subrot Panigrahi, Lorne Grieger
article en

Abstract

Optimizing grain drying process is pivotal for both economic viability and environmental sustainability. In cold countries, supplemental heating is paramount but instigates the issue of carbon release at the same time. To curve the emission, a carbon levy has been imposed that varies with fuel types. However, there is limited knowledge of the impact of field-adaptable technologies utilizing commercialized fuels on the optimal execution of grain drying. To explore this, a comprehensive three-year on-farm grain drying study was conducted in the province of Alberta, Canada. This comparative analysis centered on three critical aspects, i.e., specific energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), and operating costs. Furthermore, the research extended its projections into the year 2030, accounting for the impact of gradual carbon levies on natural gas, propane, and diesel fuel systems. showed that indirect heaters in in-bin systems were 38 % more energy-efficient than direct heaters due to better airflow and higher initial grain temperatures, while indirect heaters with diesel burners exhibited 27.8 % lower burner turndown ratios and 35.4 % higher energy consumption than natural gas counterparts. In high-temperature drying, natural gas consumption decreased as supply air temperatures rose, with double-flow dryer showing the lowest energy consumption (6.3±1.9 GJ/t) in comparison to mixed-flow and cross-flow dryer due to waste heat recovery. Heaters and Dryers operated at varying load capacities, indicated 126–135 % increase in natural gas cost with carbon levy by 2030. Achieving lower specific energy consumption in grain drying requires precise burner and process control, along with maintenance, offering valuable guidance for producers. • Indirect heaters were 38 % efficient than direct heaters in this study. • Diesel fuel in indirect heaters was 35.4 % less efficient than natural gas. • Natural gas will see 126–135 % increment in drying cost by 2030. • Grain drying rate could be higher or lower than fuel consumption rate. • Adjusting burner load is crucial for lowest energy consumption.

Energy ReportsVol. 12
University of Lethbridge (CA), Genome Prairie (CA), Institute of Agricultural Machinery (JP), Lethbridge College (CA)
Alberta Wheat Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Food Drying and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.