Analyzing the impact of design factors on solar module thermomechanical durability using interpretable machine learning techniques

Solar modules in utility-scale systems are expected to maintain decades of lifetime to rival conventional energy sources. However, cyclic thermomechanical loading often degrades their long-term performance, highlighting the importance of effective design to mitigate thermal expansion mismatches between module materials. Given the complex composition of solar modules, isolating the impact of individual components on overall durability remains a challenging task. In this work, we analyze a comprehensive data set that comprises bill-of-materials (BOM) and thermal cycling power loss from 251 distinct module designs to identify the predominant design factors and their impacts on the thermomechanical durability of modules. The methodology of our analysis combines machine learning modeling (random forest) and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) to correlate design factors with power loss and interpret the model’s decision-making. The interpretation reveals that silicon type (monocrystalline or polycrystalline), encapsulant thickness, busbar numbers, and wafer thickness predominantly influence the degradation. With lower power loss of around 0.6% on average in the SHAP analysis, monocrystalline cells present better durability than polycrystalline cells. This finding is further substantiated by statistical testing on our raw data set. The SHAP analysis also demonstrates that while thicker encapsulants lead to reduced power loss, further increasing their thickness over around 0.6 to 0.7 mm does not yield additional benefits, particularly for the front side one. In addition, other important BOM features such as the number of busbars are analyzed. This study provides a blueprint for utilizing explainable machine learning techniques in a complex material system and can potentially guide future research on optimizing the design of solar modules. • Predominant BOM factors are identified and analyzed to enhance thermomechanical durability of solar modules. • Si type, encapsulant thickness, busbar numbers and wafer thickness present high impacts on module durability. • Novel workflow using interpretable ML techniques is proposed to understand relation between BOM and durability. • Unique data set comprising BOM and thermal cycling power loss is published.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124462
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing the impact of design factors on solar module thermomechanical durability using interpretable machine learning techniques

Anubhav Jain, Todd Karin, Xin Chen
10 citations
Applied Energy
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
1.02
article

Analyzing the impact of design factors on solar module thermomechanical durability using interpretable machine learning techniques

Anubhav Jain, Todd Karin, Xin Chen
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Solar modules in utility-scale systems are expected to maintain decades of lifetime to rival conventional energy sources. However, cyclic thermomechanical loading often degrades their long-term performance, highlighting the importance of effective design to mitigate thermal expansion mismatches between module materials. Given the complex composition of solar modules, isolating the impact of individual components on overall durability remains a challenging task. In this work, we analyze a comprehensive data set that comprises bill-of-materials (BOM) and thermal cycling power loss from 251 distinct module designs to identify the predominant design factors and their impacts on the thermomechanical durability of modules. The methodology of our analysis combines machine learning modeling (random forest) and Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) to correlate design factors with power loss and interpret the model’s decision-making. The interpretation reveals that silicon type (monocrystalline or polycrystalline), encapsulant thickness, busbar numbers, and wafer thickness predominantly influence the degradation. With lower power loss of around 0.6% on average in the SHAP analysis, monocrystalline cells present better durability than polycrystalline cells. This finding is further substantiated by statistical testing on our raw data set. The SHAP analysis also demonstrates that while thicker encapsulants lead to reduced power loss, further increasing their thickness over around 0.6 to 0.7 mm does not yield additional benefits, particularly for the front side one. In addition, other important BOM features such as the number of busbars are analyzed. This study provides a blueprint for utilizing explainable machine learning techniques in a complex material system and can potentially guide future research on optimizing the design of solar modules. • Predominant BOM factors are identified and analyzed to enhance thermomechanical durability of solar modules. • Si type, encapsulant thickness, busbar numbers and wafer thickness present high impacts on module durability. • Novel workflow using interpretable ML techniques is proposed to understand relation between BOM and durability. • Unique data set comprising BOM and thermal cycling power loss is published.

Applied EnergyVol. 377
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Panos Institute West Africa (SN), University of California, Berkeley (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Solar Energy Technologies Office, Office of Energy Efficiency, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.