An Effective Investigation of Genetic Disorder Disease Using Deep Learning Methodology

This study evaluates the performance of four neural network models—Artificial Neural Network (ANN), ANN optimized with Artificial Bee Colony (ANN-ABC), Multilayer Feedforward Neural Network (MLFNN), and Forest Deep Neural Network (FDNN)—across different iteration levels to assess their effectiveness in predictive tasks. The evaluation metrics include accuracy, precision, Area Under the Curve (AUC) values, and error rates. Results indicate that FDNN consistently outperforms the other models, achieving the highest accuracy of 99%, precision of 98%, and AUC of 99 after 250 iterations, while maintaining the lowest error rate of 2.8%. MLFNN also shows strong performance, particularly at higher iterations, with notable improvements in accuracy and precision, but does not surpass FDNN. ANN-ABC offers some improvements over the standard ANN, yet falls short compared to FDNN and MLFNN. The standard ANN model, though improving with iterations, ranks lowest in all metrics. These findings highlight FDNN's robustness and reliability, making it the most effective model for high-precision predictive tasks, while MLFNN remains a strong alternative. The study underscores the importance of model selection based on performance metrics to achieve optimal predictive accuracy and reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Data Sciences
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v5i3.370
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Effective Investigation of Genetic Disorder Disease Using Deep Learning Methodology

Siti Sarah Maidin
3 citations
Journal of Applied Data Sciences
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
0.70
article

An Effective Investigation of Genetic Disorder Disease Using Deep Learning Methodology

Siti Sarah Maidin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of four neural network models—Artificial Neural Network (ANN), ANN optimized with Artificial Bee Colony (ANN-ABC), Multilayer Feedforward Neural Network (MLFNN), and Forest Deep Neural Network (FDNN)—across different iteration levels to assess their effectiveness in predictive tasks. The evaluation metrics include accuracy, precision, Area Under the Curve (AUC) values, and error rates. Results indicate that FDNN consistently outperforms the other models, achieving the highest accuracy of 99%, precision of 98%, and AUC of 99 after 250 iterations, while maintaining the lowest error rate of 2.8%. MLFNN also shows strong performance, particularly at higher iterations, with notable improvements in accuracy and precision, but does not surpass FDNN. ANN-ABC offers some improvements over the standard ANN, yet falls short compared to FDNN and MLFNN. The standard ANN model, though improving with iterations, ranks lowest in all metrics. These findings highlight FDNN's robustness and reliability, making it the most effective model for high-precision predictive tasks, while MLFNN remains a strong alternative. The study underscores the importance of model selection based on performance metrics to achieve optimal predictive accuracy and reliability.

Journal of Applied Data SciencesVol. 5(3)
INTI International University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.