Are the chemical families still there? Formal structure of similarity of elements and its thermochemical domain

The periodic table organizes chemical elements into families based on their similarity, now understood through Quantum Mechanics. However, these families were inferred from limited compounds in the nineteenth century. Since then, the number of compounds has exponentially grown, leading to the discovery of new types unknown to pioneers. This situation prompts the question of whether these families can still be discerned from the amassed data, or if their recognition is confined to specific thermochemical domains. To address this inquiry, we conducted a comprehensive exploration by comparing formulae (1771–2015) as a proxy for chemical similarity. Our findings reveal that stoichiometry not only captures a significant portion of the trends observed within families but also unveils other intriguing features of the formal structure of chemical similarity. These patterns approach equivalence classes independent of thermochemical context and demonstrate high resilience. Temporal analysis demonstrates that, since approximately 1980, similarity is diminishing due to an increasing production of unique formulae for nearly all elements. Nevertheless, chemical families endure over time and they stand out as the most robust similarity patterns. Our analysis offers compelling evidence that any study will reach the same conclusions, provided there is a sufficient diversity in input compound data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2024.0165
Primary Topic
History and advancements in chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are the chemical families still there? Formal structure of similarity of elements and its thermochemical domain

Wilmer Leal, Peter F. Stadler, Andrés Bernal, Eugenio J. Llanos et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
History and advancements in chemistry
article

Are the chemical families still there? Formal structure of similarity of elements and its thermochemical domain

Wilmer Leal, Peter F. Stadler, Andrés Bernal, Eugenio J. Llanos, Jürgen Jost
article en

Abstract

The periodic table organizes chemical elements into families based on their similarity, now understood through Quantum Mechanics. However, these families were inferred from limited compounds in the nineteenth century. Since then, the number of compounds has exponentially grown, leading to the discovery of new types unknown to pioneers. This situation prompts the question of whether these families can still be discerned from the amassed data, or if their recognition is confined to specific thermochemical domains. To address this inquiry, we conducted a comprehensive exploration by comparing formulae (1771–2015) as a proxy for chemical similarity. Our findings reveal that stoichiometry not only captures a significant portion of the trends observed within families but also unveils other intriguing features of the formal structure of chemical similarity. These patterns approach equivalence classes independent of thermochemical context and demonstrate high resilience. Temporal analysis demonstrates that, since approximately 1980, similarity is diminishing due to an increasing production of unique formulae for nearly all elements. Nevertheless, chemical families endure over time and they stand out as the most robust similarity patterns. Our analysis offers compelling evidence that any study will reach the same conclusions, provided there is a sufficient diversity in input compound data.

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 480(2298)
University of Vienna (AT), Santa Fe Institute (US), Murdoch University (AU), University of Florida (US), Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO), Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences (DE), Max Planck Institute for Mathematics (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Fundación para la promoción de la investigación y la tecnología
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
History and advancements in chemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.