Thermodynamic evaluation of solar energy-based methanol and hydrogen production and power generation pathways: A comparative study

<p dir="ltr">This work presents a comparative evaluation of two distinct fuels, methanol and hydrogen, production and power generation routes via fuel cells. The first route includes the methanol production from direct partial oxidation of methane to methanol using solar energy, where the methanol is condensed, stored, and sent to a direct methanol fuel cell. The second route is hydrogen production from solar methane cracking (named as turquoise hydrogen), where heat is supplied from concentrated solar power, and hydrogen is stored and directed to a hydrogen fuel cell. This study aims to provide insights into these fuels' production conditions, storage methods, energy, and exergy efficiencies. The proposed system is simulated using the Engineering Equation Solver software, and a thermodynamic analysis of the entire system, including all the equipment and process streams, is performed. The methanol and hydrogen route’s overall energy and exergy efficiencies are 39.75 %, 38.35 %, 34.21 %, and 33 %, respectively. The highest exergy destruction rate of 1605 kW is observed for the partial oxidation of methane to methanol. The methanol and hydrogen routes generate 32.087 MWh and 11.582 MWh of electricity for 16-hour of fuel cell operation for the same amount of methane feedstock, respectively. Sensitivity analysis has been performed to observe the effects of different parameters, such as operating temperature and mass flow rate of fuels, on the electricity production and energy efficiencies of the systems.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Thermal Science and Engineering Progress<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102911" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102911</a></p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Published
2024-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102911
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermodynamic evaluation of solar energy-based methanol and hydrogen production and power generation pathways: A comparative study

Yusuf Biçer, Amira Chebbi
8 citations
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.86
article

Thermodynamic evaluation of solar energy-based methanol and hydrogen production and power generation pathways: A comparative study

Yusuf Biçer, Amira Chebbi
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">This work presents a comparative evaluation of two distinct fuels, methanol and hydrogen, production and power generation routes via fuel cells. The first route includes the methanol production from direct partial oxidation of methane to methanol using solar energy, where the methanol is condensed, stored, and sent to a direct methanol fuel cell. The second route is hydrogen production from solar methane cracking (named as turquoise hydrogen), where heat is supplied from concentrated solar power, and hydrogen is stored and directed to a hydrogen fuel cell. This study aims to provide insights into these fuels' production conditions, storage methods, energy, and exergy efficiencies. The proposed system is simulated using the Engineering Equation Solver software, and a thermodynamic analysis of the entire system, including all the equipment and process streams, is performed. The methanol and hydrogen route’s overall energy and exergy efficiencies are 39.75 %, 38.35 %, 34.21 %, and 33 %, respectively. The highest exergy destruction rate of 1605 kW is observed for the partial oxidation of methane to methanol. The methanol and hydrogen routes generate 32.087 MWh and 11.582 MWh of electricity for 16-hour of fuel cell operation for the same amount of methane feedstock, respectively. Sensitivity analysis has been performed to observe the effects of different parameters, such as operating temperature and mass flow rate of fuels, on the electricity production and energy efficiencies of the systems.</p><h2>Other Information</h2><p dir="ltr">Published in: Thermal Science and Engineering Progress<br>License: <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a><br>See article on publisher's website: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102911" target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102911</a></p>

Thermal Science and Engineering ProgressVol. 55
Qatar Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.